David Mitchell
Jim and Linda,
That is what I meant with my comment about sheep "gas" in New Zealand. (and I'm afraid I fall into your "beloved's" category - we should look into that idea)
I agree ther may be some debate about the cause. I am one who places stock in both natural and mandmade warming theories. But I can't grasp how anyone could argue that warming itself is not happening - and that man made air pollution is not even a factor. We hear the word Hoax used often by friends in (my own) GOP, but it begs the question - what hoax? Why does it have to be a hoax? Why do I have to beleive in a Hoax just becaue some on the same "Right" (as I am - sort of) claim it to be for some politically mandated agenda. I must be ignorant - prey, tell me, what purpose is served by a hoax - on either side? Debate, yes. But Hoax?
How much of a Hoax do we think it must be for millions of Island peoples, or for Bangladesh Dash, or for the entire Newport Virginia area? (or for the nervous hazard insurance industry as they ponder the next "Irene" with all that expensive air condtioning equipmet residing in the basements of large office buildings in NYC, Boston, Baltimore, etc.?)
And just how many "studies" do we need? Are we not permitted to use our own God-given senses?
I am able to observe with my own eyes that many (if not most) snow capped peaks have lost much of their snowcover over the last century - (coincidentally, a century in which the automobile came into use). Snowcaps that feed agriculture and hydro power - as in "The Snows of Kilamanjaro". I don't need a "study" to learn that ocean temperatures have risen, and that coral reefs are dying. I already know enough people who live travel and work in such areas to hear it first hand. I don't need a "study" to read the news about the problems facing the Norfolk and Newport News areas of Virginia. Who needs another study to add to the countless photos and articles of polar ice cap shrinkage? And thank you, but I was able to SEE and SMELL with my own eyes and nose - (and without all the studies) - our "brown cloud" in Denver.
This line of "reasoning" reminds me of the many studies in our lifetime about the effects of Television on children. Does TV affect children? Does TV advertising affect children? Does TV advertising of sugar coated serial affect children? Does TV advertisisng of music, toys, food, and violence affect children?
How about a study on the bad influences on us (or our children) by the wrong kind of kids we ran with? Did that take a "study"? REALLY?
More studies? More experts? Are you kidding me?
*(this goes right back to my earlier post about "ideologies" and dogmatic thinking. Why as a conservative thinker, am I not permitted, no, expected to use my own powers of observation?)
|