Michael McLeod
Tim:
Great question.
I'll have to start by disagreeing with your premise, which I understand to be: "the press feels bad for buying into the polls that indicated Trump will lose, therefore writes bad things about him in an effort to regain the respect of readers and viewers."
This reminds me of a highway patrolman I was talking to who had picked up a guy on some rap and the guy was telling him that the highway patrol was just out to get him, that it had a vendetta against him. And the patrolman said: "You give us way too much credit. We're too busy putting out fires to have the time to organize a vendetta against anybody."
We are in an extremely tempestuous time in our history -- and by "our" I mean the world, not just our country -- and we have an extremely tempestous president, a maverick with no governing experience, whose job is to lead us through it. He appears to have a temperment and a battle plans that involves confrontation and my-way-or-the-highway style. He has used it against journalists, whom he calls enemies of the people, so you probably shouldn't be listening to me in the first place. He has also used it against scientists, whom he discredits and disbelieves, so I guess you can't believe what they say about the environment, either. He has used it against our allies nearly as much as he has used it to get into a verbal pissing match with an equally tempestous dictator with his finger on a nuclear trigger. I am not saying he is wrong in doing any of this. It's what he does. It's who he is. I am not saying this style is not wonderfully effective and absolutely perfect for the challenges of our time. What I will say; the sole argument I am making, is this: Anyone who operates in the way that Trump is operating will be challenged by a free press that is doing its job. And you should be pretty damn grateful for that.
I'd suggest that you consult a variety of llegitimate news sources to see if you find indications of good, analytical, professional journalism taking place. One thing you might consider is to get a digital subscription to the New York Times, which is one of the few remaining print publication with the resources to track the news of an extremely complex world. It's dirt cheap. Like 20 bucks a month. And one hell of a lot more reliable, whatever you think of the main stream press, than the crappola available in the dark recesses of the internet. Trump, of course, likes to attack the NYTimes. But I've never see a single word out of his mouth about it that had any logical analysis in it. And that's what I have been living by for 50 years. Had too. If I so much as mispelled a name I got reamed out for it. Any trained journalist will tell you that. We do our best to tell it straight. I have my prejudices. I have my blind spots. But I know common sense and logical argumentation when I see it. And I know we are lost as a species when we lose track of it. And frankly, these days, I am scared to death, and very, very sad for our country.
|