David Mitchell
Jim,
As a moderately consrvative thinker I am in some degree of agreement with much of what you argue we needed, and had not gotten in some prior years. Of all people, Chris Matthews ("Hard Ball") offered a pretty fair assessment of what "the Donald" had achieved. He ("the Donald") had tapped into a segement of our population who were tired of "nambypamby-ness" in our leadership, and felt their voices had gone on unheard long enough.
However, I simply cannot accept that this man has done much other than cheer the stock market upwards, and maybe drop one huge bomb on the right target. I cannot square his behavior with my third grade Baltimore Catechism, nor can I square this with the truths my conservative Christian parents taught me.
A popular "Christian-Right" author and lecturer, Max Lucato, published an article about two years ago asking if the leader of our country should not at least measure up to the standards we would set for a young man coming to our door to date our daughters. I wish I could find it - it really was well written.
I personally cannot compromise basic fundamental priciples of social behavior and moral character for my politial interests. In fact, "my" political party seems to have gone a course that I am forced more and more to question.
e.g. Why do we champion laws that forbid our health care plans to bargain with "big pharma"? (the VA is allowed this right, and does a much better job of holding the line on drug costs.) Why do we pass laws in the IRS code that allow double tax right-offs for violent video games? Why are we passing a law that forbids individuals to sue banks, but big banks can still sue individuals? These seem to be faustian bargains with power of the worst kind. Whay did all of our candidaates beat their chest about more and more military (armament) spending, while battle-wounded combat veterans cannot even get a doctor's appointment. I only have to wait months for my own appointments, but at least there is no parking for me when I do get there anyway.
I seems to me that our Grand Ole' "Party of Lincoln has either sold themselves to Wall Street, or Big Pharma, or they have run off to join Mr. McConnel's royal order of the circus clowns - as was so aptly demonstrated in our last campaign where 20 odd guys acted not like statesmen, but more like little boys who needed someone in the building to call their parents.
As for John's press comments (wow John - you're back on!). I agree, and it annoys the heck out of me. As Bill O'Reilly said so succinctly, "It's not about accurate journalism. It's all about the "entertainment value." Important issues be damned!
I remember being asked who I voted for. They assumed I voted for the thrid party candiadte (who eventually proved himself to be a complete ignoramus). I finally confided to a few friends that I had voted for the 4th party candidate. - a conservative lawyer in Nashville or Memphis who opposed abortion and favored legaized medical marijauna. I chose him for one reason. That was that he and his wife had funded and ran a home for child orphans of Romania. My friends all commented that I had "Wasted my vote." I just looked them in the eye and said "No, You wasted your vote."
I accept that we have had a number of egomaniacs in this office before, but an ignorant, raving, narcissistic psychopath is more than I can take.
So, as for this topic - In the immortal words of Billy Joel, "We Didn't Start the Fire" - Tim did. (it's all his fault)
And Jim, I wish we could play some golf or go off on a photo-shoot together. I miss you buddy.
(And I'd walk a mile for a good political arguement. Are we havin' fun now!)
|