|
John Jackson
Not sure what happened to me last night when I wrote that previous post – something came over me and my skin and hair took on an orangish glow. I ballooned up to almost twice my normal size except for my hands (which got really small)...
But now that I feel like I’m back to my normal bleeding heart self I’ll say that I’m not in favor of open borders and I don’t really know anyone who is. Every rational nation wants to control its borders and monitor/limit who comes in. I totally agree we can’t let in everyone on earth who wants to come here and I’ll freely admit I don’t know what the answer is. But I do draw the line at taking kids (including toddlers and infants) from their parents with uncertain prospects that they’ll ever see each other again.
But since we as a nation don’t seem to able to decide how to reform our immigration policies, until we reach that agreement I propose that we follow the immigration policies we’ve had all along which include well-established procedures for vetting people who claim refugee status – in the past some have gotten in and many more were denied (including during the Obama Administration when immigration groups angrily accused him of being the “deporter in chief”).
But what really prompted my post is how Trump has manufactured this whole crisis to fire up his xenophobic base (many of whose families, like mine, hardly came over on the Mayflower). To be sure, we still have a problem at the southern border but it’s a problem that’s gotten dramatically better, not worse, over the past 20 or so years. According to the Border Patrol’s own statistics, since the year 2000 apprehensions at the border with Mexico have dropped by a factor of FOUR (from 1.6 million in 2000 to under 400,000 this year) with almost all of the drop occurring in the 2000-2012 period. https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/assets/documents/2017-Dec/BP%20Total%20Apps%2C%20Mexico%2C%20OTM%20FY2000-FY2017.pdf)
So do we have a problem – yes. But “our failed immigration policies” have led to a situation that’s way better than it was in 2000. And, if anything, it seems like all the tough talk has motivated more people to try to enter soon in anticipation of an even more brutal crackdown - border apprehensions, even with the child separation policy, are UP this year over 2017.
Linda, I totally grant that in a crowd of 5 or 7 thousand people there are bound to be some bad eggs and hangers-on, but if you’re going to convince me that most of them are MS-13 gang members and Middle Easterners seeking to wreak havoc here, I’m going to need a more mainstream reference than Judicial Watch, which is hardly known for its balance. I haven't read any of Mike's links but I suspect they paint a very different picture.
Fear of immigrants (and “the other” generally) is Trump’s signature issue and the idea that Democrats would orchestrate an event that is charging up Trump’s base doesn’t ring true. In fact, from what I can see, Republican congressional candidates are desperate to avoid talking about the tax cut, the ACA, and pre-existing conditions and they want desperately to shift the focus to that ominous, threatening Caravan.
I know there is a substantial segment of the class (quite possibly a large majority) that thinks political subjects should be avoided and I understand that (and normally I would probably even agree). But these are not normal times and, from time to time, I feel compelled to bring these subjects up.
|