|
Timothy Lavelle
...and now, an attempt at levity...
Most old sayings make pretty good sense to me.
They seem to get "old" because they actually help explain a foggy point that benefits from down home logic.
Like, "You can lead a horse to water but..." etc. means "You can introduce Mary Margaret and Frank personally to Obama, but they will not vote further to the left than Attila the Trump". Yeah, that definistion probably sucks. Let's try a different one.
What exactly do we mean when we say "You can't have your cake and eat it too". Of course I can. I love cake. I've eaten it, and it is still mine....only in my belly! So is this old saying a type of physics statement, like off of Big Bang, saying that a thing either exists or doesn't? Can you give me a simple example involving Mary Margaret and Frank? Like, "You can't believe in freedom for all but still believe that you have the right to tell the rest of us non-conservative types how to live our lives". Or use me, like "LaVelle, you can't expect to get a laugh while poking fun at people we love".
Remember, I am the guy who has a mental blind spot for "affect versus effect". I only use Frank and Maggie in order to fire up your attn level while still enjoying poking a stick in the spokes of their conservative bicycles. I really would like to hear what you think this old saying means. Wonder if I should have used the strike-through like Frank did...a real attn getter.
Or how about "Once you get to where you're going, there you are". What the hell is that supposed to mean?
|