Message Forum

Welcome to the Watterson High School Message Forum.

The message forum is an ongoing dialogue between classmates. There are no items, topics, subtopics, etc.

Forums work when people participate - so don't be bashful! Click the "Post Message" button to add your entry to the forum.


 
go to bottom 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page      

10/01/20 11:41 AM #8171    

Timothy Lavelle

Just thinking...The benefit of this forum to me is special to me. Since the reunion and with this method I have been able to hear from people privately that otherwise I would have lived out my life without hearing from again.

 To all of you, the answer is still "no". Stop asking.

Still thinking...Lastly, you don't think a political season could be more insane...I offer you a mini view. If the much fantasized Independent Party could have put a knowledgeable candidate up, the political scene would be more chaotic than anything we've seen. Just imagine...

We're good. We'll get through this.

 

 


10/01/20 01:14 PM #8172    

 

Frank Ganley

Tim does that mean I'm out as far as talking , texting as I said no politics, or because I like the one you hate ! If I'm out let me know if I'm in say yes , I am hoping I'm still in. Rather disappointing to lose a friend over a difference of political opinion. Frank


10/01/20 03:18 PM #8173    

 

David Mitchell

First of all, I am NOT a liberal. And I also prefer think for myself. And I beleive I do have a right to express an opinion.

I watched every moment (except for one quick dash to the refigerator) of the "debacle". I thought Trump's behavior during the debate was absolutely atrocious - childish - shamefully low and spiteful - like the spoiled child that he is. And so do some other Conservatives. At times he was utterly out of control.  One of the Republican commentaters immediately following the event said so also. Several GOP senators have expresed their shock that he doesn't have the gumption to condemn racist militant groups such as the "Proud Boys" - a dangerous and well-known group who beleive in white male supremacy. I hope you saw some of the articles the next day about how they cheered and celibrated his enocuraging comments "stand down". (I have kids in Portland and I have been hearing about them for several years now)

Doesn't any of that frighten you!

He never shut up, refused to follow the rules of the debate, interupted Biden over and over and over again, and told several lies. He lied about his taxes, lied about the Porltand chief of police, and lied when he said he "didn't know the Proud Boys".  (Well, I guess he does now.)

But I thought his worst comment was when he said "I don't know Beau." Only a sociopathic, childish, draft-dodging, coward would take such a chep shot at a man's patriotic, deceased son. How disgusting!

If he isn't the textbook example of a sociopath I would like to hear your own medical diagnosis of what is.

(I look forward to the next few years (in or out of office) as we watch his creditors call his hundreds of millions of dollars of loans. "Successful businesman - who's kidding who? More like master con-man.)


10/01/20 03:23 PM #8174    

 

David Mitchell

p.s. You may have caught my spelling of the word "commentaters" in the post above, and thought it to be another of my many spelling errors.

Rather than correct it, I thought I would explain that it is a word - at least down here it is. 

"Commentaters" are "taters" that are in frequent supply and are "commenly" available to all who enjoy them.

 


10/01/20 04:30 PM #8175    

 

Michael McLeod

Yeah the labels are interesting, Dave. 

The eyes that fix you in a formulated phrase.

That's from TS Eliot.

I see things from the point of view of 40 years of teaching writing and as many years of writing for American newspapers and magazines.

If all that did was turn me into somebody who sees things through a single lense that you can describe with one word that sure was a waste of time and money. 

So I am changing my tune.

Maybe there is something to this voter fraud thing after all.

 

"Two right-wing political operatives were charged Thursday with a series of felonies in connection with a robocall scheme that Michigan’s attorney general said was part of a broad effort intended to intimidate minority voters from casting mail-in ballots.

The operatives, Jack Burkman and Jacob Wohl, made automated calls to around 12,000 Michigan residents in August, warning them that their personal information from mail-in ballots could be used to execute outstanding arrest warrants or by credit card companies to collect unpaid debts, the authorities said.

Many of the residents who were targeted live in Detroit and other cities, said Dana Nessel, Michigan’s attorney general.

The calls — believed to be among 85,000 made nationally by the operatives — also claimed that mail-in voting information could be used by the government to track people for mandatory vaccination programs, the attorney general’s office said.

Both men have drawn attention for their efforts to smear opponents of President Trump.

“This effort specifically targeted minority voters in an attempt to deter them from voting in the November election,” Ms. Nessel said in a statement. “We’re all well aware of the frustrations caused by the millions of nuisance robocalls flooding our cellphones and landlines each day, but this particular message poses grave consequences for our democracy and the principles upon which it was built. Michigan voters are entitled to a full, free and fair election in November and my office will not hesitate to pursue those who jeopardize that.”

Mr. Burkman, 54, of Arlington, Va., and Mr. Wohl, 22, of Los Angeles, were each charged with intimidating voters, conspiracy to intimidate voters, using a computer to intimidate voters and conspiracy to use a computer to intimidate voters, according to a criminal complaint.

Mr. Burkman, who is well known for peddling right-wing conspiracy theories and who has tried to smear public figures that included the special counsel Robert S. Mueller III with fabricated sexual misconduct allegations, did not immediately respond to a request for comment."

 

 

 


10/02/20 12:47 PM #8176    

Timothy Lavelle

I remember hoping for an interesting life...

Secret parties of Dems in closed room with no microphones or cameras doing the Snoopy Happy Dance while practicing their "Gee, this is sooo sad" face.

Repubs is closed door sessions trying to figure out the best ways to spin this most recent challenge, to keep their jobs.

While I don't believe the same way many of you do, I can't help but imagine the meeting in heaven where god decided to have some wicked fun..."First I call my Notorious Girl home to give the rednecks a little hope and sadden the socialists...then I wait while things cook...then I give Trump the corona virus to bum out the rednecks and hearten the commies...O My Me, wait'll you see what I throw in next"!

But, you know, I can also hear Big Sally from memory using those same words your own Mother used when you refused to listen and wound up getting hurt..."What did you expect". So, Donny, what did you expect?   

I continue to believe we should do what we can to enjoy the ride and stay sane. Assuming I'm sane...

Wash, mask up, vote. Throw the bum and his cohorts to the curb.   

 

 

 


10/02/20 01:45 PM #8177    

 

Frank Ganley

I guess I got my answer fromMr LaVelle


10/02/20 11:43 PM #8178    

 

John Jackson

There’s a lot of low-hanging “I told you so” fruit from the last 24 hours that I’ll ignore and instead focus on some real voter fraud (aka voter suppression)  which is far more widespread.  Greg Abbott, the Republican governor of Texas, has decreed that each county in Texas can have only one drop-off box for mail-in ballots.  This means, for example, that Harris County (which includes heavily-Democratic Houston with a population of more than 5 million and an area of 1600 square miles) has a single place to drop off ballots. 

I can only assume Gov. Abbot did this since Trump a few days ago was up only 2% in an average of half a dozen polls in bright red Texas.  Is  Abbot worried that Trump's weekend (or longer) sojourn at Walter Reed might cause some of Trump's mask-averse cult to start to re-think and tip the balance?

 

 


10/03/20 01:16 AM #8179    

 

David Mitchell

Bob Gibson, Hall of Fame ace for Cardinals, dies at 84

I pitched in 8th grade - quite poorly I might add. Tom litzinger, Kevin ryan, and joe royce could attest to that - ALTHOUGH KENNY GRIMES - AHEM, FATHER GRIMES LIKED MY CURVE BALL - WHICH WORKED WELL ON the fifth tuesday after EVERY OTHER LUNAR ECLIPSE - sort of.
I loved pitching and I loved TO WATCH GOOD pitChers. two of my favorite players of all time were pitchers - sandy koufax of the dodgers, and bob gibson of the cardinals. Man were they fun to watch - faster than anything i ever saw. Bob gibson would simply blow it by the hitters. I used to WISH that i could throw as fast as he did. One year hIs e.r.a. WAS ONLY 1.12 PER GAME,,,,, FOR THE ENTIRE SEASON - RIDICULOUS!
He died tonight.
If I EVER get to heaven, maybe I'll get to SEE that fast ball again.
 
SPORTS

FILE – In this Oct. 2, 1968, file photo, St. Louis Cardinals ace pitcher Bob Gibson throws to Detroit Tigers’ Norm Cash during the ninth inning of Game 1 of the baseball World Series at Busch Stadium in St. Louis. Gibson, the dominating pitcher who won a record seven consecutive World Series starts and set a modern standard for excellence when he finished the 1968 season with a 1.12 ERA, died Friday, Oct. 2, 2020. He was 84. (AP Photo, File)

ST. LOUIS (AP) — Hall of Famer Bob Gibson, the dominating St. Louis Cardinals pitcher who won a record seven consecutive World Series starts and set a modern standard for excellence when he finished the 1968 season with a 1.12 ERA, died Friday. He was 84.


10/03/20 01:21 AM #8180    

 

David Mitchell

ditto what John said just about the Governor of Texas. Begs the question - WHY?


10/03/20 09:55 AM #8181    

 

Bonnie Jonas (Jonas-Boggioni)

Before the rest of the Forum land goes apoplectic over the mis-information that John is spreading, the "pick" up is for those who want to DELIVER - IN PERSON their ballots.  It is not being done for voter supression.  You can still drop your absentte ballot in any mail box/post office.

As for me, even though I did an absentee ballot in 2018 (three weeks after my Bone Marrow Transplant), I am going to go - in person - to vote early this year.

There arenot many times I risk myself like this, but there are sometimes when my rightous Irish goes off!  I can hear my Mother's voice in my head!


10/03/20 10:19 AM #8182    

 

John Jackson

Bonnie is absolutely correct  but I never meant to suggest the single drop-off box per county was the only way to vote with mail-in ballots in Texas - I think it’s pretty obvious to most people that “mail-in ballots” (as I referred to them) can always be mailed.  

But after Trump's new Postmaster General's efforts to slow down postal deliveries, I'd prefer not to count on the Postal Service to deliver my ballot in time to be counted.  

And if Governor Abbott's policy is so innocent, what's the purpose in having only one box?


10/03/20 10:37 AM #8183    

 

Michael McLeod

Here's the run-down on this Texas thing. 

You certainly can read it as being connected to the republican effort to supress. Whether that's out of calculation or paranoia depends upon your own intrpretation and pov. And it bear remember that this happens against the backdrop of the virus, and the reticence of everyone, particularly people our age, to go out and face crowds. Everyone should have every opportunity to vote and both parties ought to be making that as easy and safe - and, yes, free of manipulation of any sort - as possible. But that doesn't seem to be the case.

 

Voting rights advocates have filed suit against Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, contending that his new order limiting mail-ballot drop-off locations to one per county burdens voters and “undermines the public’s confidence in the election itself.”

The complaint, filed late Thursday in federal court, seeks to block enforcement of an order Abbott (R) issued Thursday and to allow counties to offer multiple ballot drop-off locations ahead of a projected rise in mail voting during the general election.

The increase is expected despite state GOP officials’ success in maintaining strict eligibility limits on mail voting during the coronavirus pandemic. The state is one of only five that is prohibiting voters fearful of exposure to the virus from casting mail ballots this fall.

“The impact of this eleventh-hour decisions is momentous, targets Texas’ most vulnerable voters — older voters, and voters with disabilities — and results in wild variations in access to absentee voting drop-off locations depending on the county a voter resides in,” the lawsuit stated. “It also results in predictable disproportionate impacts on minority communities . . . already hit hardest by the COVID-19 crisis.”

 

 

It was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas by the nonprofit Campaign Legal Center on behalf of the Texas and national League of United Latin American Citizens groups, as well as the state chapter of the League of Women Voters and two individual voters.

The legal action came hours after Abbott issued his order, a move that Democrats and voting rights advocates decried, saying it was aimed at suppressing the vote and warning it could hurt populous cities that are Democratic strongholds.

Abbott said having a single drop-off location per county is necessary for “ballot security,” echoing unfounded claims by President Trump about the risks of voting by mail.

“The State of Texas has a duty to voters to maintain the integrity of our elections,” the governor said in a statement Thursday, adding, “These enhanced security protocols will ensure greater transparency and will help stop attempts at illegal voting.”

Texas governor’s limit on drop-off sites for mail-in ballots criticized as voter suppression

John Wittman, a spokesman for Abbott, declined to comment on why the governor considers multiple drop-off locations to be less secure. Experts say there is no evidence that mail voting will lead to widespread election fraud, as Trump as repeatedly asserted.

AD

In a statement, Wittman also asserted that Abbott “has not limited voting — instead he has expanded access to voting.” He argued that the governor’s executive order allowed voters to turn in their mail ballot anytime leading up to Election Day, claiming this was not previously allowed under Texas law.

Abbott’s order states that voters casting mail ballots can return them to a “single early voting clerk’s office location.” That meant election officials in several heavily populated Texas counties had to shutter existing drop-off locations that had been opened to make it easier for voters to cast mail ballots.

The order also allows poll watchers to observe the drop-off process.

The clerk of Harris County — the state’s most populous county, with more than 4.7 million residents — said the governor’s order “is confusing to voters and will serve to suppress Texas votes, plain and simple.”

AD

“Make no mistake, this is intentional,” Democrat Chris Hollins said at a news conference Friday. “This is being done to make it more difficult for you to vote. But I urge you — do not be discouraged. If every voter only takes away one thing from today, I want it to be that your vote is your voice in our democracy.”

Comprising 254 counties and more than 260,000 square miles of land, area-wise Texas is the largest of the Lower 48 states. More than 70 of its counties exceed 1,000 square miles; the largest, Brewster County, contains roughly 6,200 square miles.

Courts view GOP fraud claims skeptically as Democrats score key legal victories over mail voting

Anthony Gutierrez, executive director of Common Cause Texas, said in a statement that in Harris County, “reducing 11 drop off locations to only 1 severely limits voting access and forces people to choose between voting and their health.” The county, which includes Houston, comprises 1,777 square miles.

AD

He called Abbott’s order “blatant voter suppression and yet another way the politicians in charge are putting barriers between Texans and the ballot box.”

“With last-minute changes and pending litigation, it is increasingly clear that confusion in Texas elections is part of a pattern of voter suppression,” he said.

Under Texas law, only a limited number of voters can vote by mail this fall — those who are 65 or older, disabled, in jail or traveling outside their county of residence during early voting and on Election Day.

The suit filed Thursday is the latest development in a broader legal conflict between Republicans and voting rights advocates, who have partnered with Democrats in Texas and throughout the country in efforts to loosen restrictions on mail voting during the pandemic.

Other legal challenges to Abbott’s order may follow. Republicans for the Rule of Law, a group of anti-Trump conservatives, is also interested in joining the battle against the order, the group told The Washington Post on Thursday.


10/03/20 03:13 PM #8184    

 

David Mitchell

as I asked before - Why?

What is the correleation between the number of "drop boxes" and "voter security"? I don't see any - other than to make it more or less difficult on voters. Is anyone suggesting that the burden (or cost) of more boxes is so great that they cannot afford them? Oh, maybe a bit of extra driving to collect them. I hardy think that argument justifies this odd decision. 

So maybe they compromise on the number of drop points - say, from eleven, down to five or six. But to go to one single box for a whole county seems to make their intentions so suspect that it naturally raises qustions. I mean, who would not be suspsicious of such a strange and shallow argument - espeially during this election?

---------- I got distracted and forgot my last question. If any mailbox is okay then why even have these special voter boxes? I'm asking that question sincerely - not rhetorically.


10/03/20 03:15 PM #8185    

 

Michael McLeod

When Former NJ Governor Chris Christie, who helped Trump prepare for that debate debacle, has also tested positive, and after hearing the news Stephen King texted him: "You're a dipshit for not taking precautions, but I wish you well."


10/03/20 03:43 PM #8186    

 

Michael McLeod

Mark:

 

Check this out if you haven't seen it already. Probably way too raw/racy/real for the more delicate souls among out classmates but a really fabulous project to my eyes. Reminded me of some of the characters I ran into during my days on the police beat.

Tangerine is a 2015 American comedy-drama film directed by Sean Baker, and written by Baker and Chris Bergoch, starring Kitana Kiki RodriguezMya Taylor, and James Ransone. The story follows a transgender sex worker who discovers her boyfriend and pimp has been cheating on her. The film was shot with three iPhone 5S smartphones.[4]

Tangerine premiered at the 2015 Sundance Film Festival on January 23, 2015. It had a limited release on July 10, 2015, through Magnolia Pictures.[5] It received critical acclaim for its screenplay, direction, performances and portrayal of transgender individuals.


10/03/20 05:05 PM #8187    

 

James Hamilton, M. D.

For those interested, I posted on the "General Discussion" of the "User Forum" a topic I called "A Tale of Two Viruses".

Jim


10/03/20 08:47 PM #8188    

 

David Barbour

Thank you Mike, you are a hero defending sanity and honesty in our press which literaly protects

our nation against lying, cheating dirtbags like the orange dirtbag.

DB


10/04/20 10:54 AM #8189    

Lawrence Foster

I found Jim Hamilton's post "A Tale of Two Viruses" over on the User Forum an interesting read. 

Below is a link to the "Select Subcommittee on the Coronovirus Crisis" released on October 2,  Yes, it is written by Republicans so don't start yelling right away that it is fake news.  

If interested you can look at the supporting documents in this report.  Some are listed as footnotes but there are also active links on pages 42-47 to scientific reports.  This is where the facts are and they are not slanted by main stream news media outlets.

Copy and paste this link into your browser for the pdf file of the report:

https://republicans-oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/SSOCC-Report-10-2-20.pdf

 

 


10/04/20 11:09 AM #8190    

 

Michael McLeod

Thanks for the link Larry. It makes the prez look good but actions speak louder than words. And thanks for the support, Dave. The demonization and unreasoned, whole-cloth dismissal of the country's journalists is a big part of the reason our country is so sick  - both literally and figuratively - right now. 


10/04/20 11:22 AM #8191    

 

Michael McLeod

And here's a lovely piece that Maureen Dowd wrote that ran yesterday.

So nicely written it qualifies as literary journalism in my book.

WASHINGTON — Fate leads the willing, Seneca said, while the unwilling get dragged.

For his entire life, Donald Trump has stayed one step ahead of disaster, plying his gift for holding reality at bay.

He conjured his own threadbare reality, about success, about virility, about imbroglios with women, even about the height of Trump Tower.

As president, he has created a bubble within his bubble, keeping out science and anything that made him look bad. He has played a dangerous game of alchemizing wishes to facts, pretending that he was a strong leader, pretending that the virus will magically disappear and that it “affects virtually nobody,’’ pretending that we don’t have to wear masks, pretending that dicey remedies could work, pretending that the vaccine is right around the corner.

Now, in a moment that feels biblical, the implacable virus has come to his door.

This was the week when many of the president’s pernicious deceptions boomeranged on him. It was redolent of the “Night on Bald Mountain” scene in “Fantasia,’’ when all the bad spirits come out in a dark swarm.

 

The man whose father told him there are only killers and zeros, the man who cruelly castigated others as losers, the man who was taught to fear losing above all else, has been doing some very public losing of his own.

Upsetting as it is to see the president and first lady facing a mortal threat — and the glee and memes from some on the left were vulgar — it was undeniable that reality was crashing in on the former reality star.

Remarkable new reporting in The New York Times exposed the hoax of Trump, master businessman. Even as he was beginning to swagger around “The Apprentice” to the tune of “For the Love of Money” by The O’Jays in 2004, he was filing a tax return reporting $89.9 million in net losses. The gilt barely covered the rot.

“The red ink spilled from everywhere, even as American television audiences saw him as a savvy business mogul with the Midas touch,’’ the Times reported, adding: “the show’s big ratings meant that everyone wanted a piece of the Trump brand, and he grabbed at the opportunity to rent it out. There was $500,000 to pitch Double Stuf Oreos, another half-million to sell Domino’s Pizza and $850,000 to push laundry detergent.’’

There were Trump seminars on wealth, and that Midas myth propelled the coarse political neophyte into the White House. But the year Trump won the presidency and his first year as president, he paid only $750 in federal income taxes.

 

Tuesday’s debate pierced another reality that Trump had been hawking on Fox for months — that his opponent was an addled husk who would need performance drugs to stand at the podium, and that Trump would stride in like a colossus and clobber him in a trice.

Instead, the ugly reality was there for all to see: Trump was truculent, whiny and nasty, and Joe Biden was fine. Trump was indecent, on everything from white supremacists to Hunter Biden’s addiction, and Biden was decent.

And, in the end, the con man in the Oval Office could not con the virus. He was a perverse Pied Piper of contagion, luring crowds to his rallies and events on the White House lawn, even as he mocked the safety measures recommended by his own government, sidelined and undermined Dr. Anthony Fauci, and turned the mask into a symbol of blue-state wimpiness.

“I don’t wear masks like him,’’ Trump sneered about Biden, at the obstreperous Cleveland debate. “Every time you see him, he’s got a mask.

“He could be speaking 200 feet away,’’ the president continued, “and he shows up with the biggest mask I’ve ever seen.”

Members of the Trump family, sitting in the front row, followed the patriarch’s example. They ditched their masks during the debate, ignoring the requirements that they keep them on.

It seemed inevitable that Trump would get infected, given his insouciance on the issue of protective measures combined with his age, weight and ambitious travel schedule. He seemed oddly intent on tempting fate. Certainly, he put a lot of his fans, especially older ones in the most vulnerable demographic (like Herman Cain, who died of Covid after attending a Trump rally in Tulsa, Okla.), at risk with his dismissiveness about the virus, laxity on testing and tracing, and his insistence on continuing rallies.

 

Even for Trump, it was an astonishing act of hubris, asking his base to choose between paying homage to him or protecting their own lives.

As Nancy Pelosi told Stephanie Ruhle on MSNBC Friday morning, “Going into crowds unmasked and all the rest was sort of a brazen invitation for something like this to happen, sad that it did, but nonetheless, hopeful that it will be a transition to a saner approach to what this virus is all about.”

But now that it has happened, it creates an alarming situation. How will a White House shrouded in secrecy and lies deal with a sick president who specializes in secrecy and lies?

The public never found out what happened that Saturday last year when the president was whisked off to Walter Reed medical center, a visit that was raised again this weekend, as reporters noted that we might not even know all Trump’s underlying conditions.

White House officials tried to be reassuring on Friday, saying that the president’s symptoms were “mild,’’ but it was clear that things could be serious when the White House doctor, Sean Conley, put out a statement in the late afternoon saying that Trump was taking an experimental antibody cocktail.

There was also an eerie silence all day from the president’s usually rambunctious Twitter account. Then, Marine One landed on the South Lawn in the evening to take him to Walter Reed for a few days. At 6:31 p.m., the president tweeted a video saying that Melania was “doing very well” and that he thought he was doing “very well,” but that he was going to hospital to “make sure that things work out.” And at 11:31 p.m., he tweeted: “Going well, I think! Thank you to all. LOVE!!!”

Democrats tried to be nice. On Friday, the Biden campaign paused their negative ads, and Barack Obama said at a virtual fund-raiser that despite being in a fight “with issues that have a lot at stake,’’ we’re still Americans and “we want to make sure everybody is healthy.” (At the same moment, the Trump campaign issued an attack on “lyin’ Obama.”)

 

I have long marveled that Donald Trump never seemed to get sick, either during the campaign or in office, and had an extraordinary amount of energy for a man of 74 who binged junk food and skipped the gym. He has been a great advertisement for not smoking and drinking. So it was stunning to see Trump walk out, finally wearing a mask, waving as he took off for Walter Reed, with the election only a month away and the next scheduled presidential debate two weeks from now.

With the West Wing in a panic, and with Republicans feeling the White House and Senate slipping away, the Democrats made moves on two fronts.

Pelosi thought the Republicans might be more amenable to the bigger aid package that she has been pushing, now that Covid had become scarily real to them.

As she pointed out, if the president could get infected — “with all the protection that he has”— think of how vulnerable ordinary people are, “if you’ve lost your job and lost your health care and you’re food insecure and you’re on the verge of eviction.’’ Trump’s diagnosis should be, she said, “a learning experience.”

It also could change the dynamic of Mitch McConnell’s hypocritical push to get Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court nomination crammed through the Senate, because she will have to do more of her meetings with lawmakers virtually. The Democrats now hope to slow down the rush to appoint the conservative judge who, according to news reports this week, signed a newspaper ad in 2006 that called Roe v. Wade “a barbaric legacy” and supported overturning it.

As Chuck Schumer and Dianne Feinstein said in a joint statement, Democrats need to “ensure a full and fair hearing that is not rushed, not truncated and not virtual.”

The pictures from the Rose Garden last Saturday, where President Trump nominated Judge Barrett, scream superspreader. There’s a maskless Trump and maskless Republican lawmakers and a maskless president of the University of Notre Dame and lots of hugs, kisses and handshakes. Mike Lee and Thom Tillis, both Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee, were there; on Friday they said they had tested positive for the virus, as did John Jenkins, the president of Notre Dame, and Kellyanne Conway, Trump’s former top aide who was also in the Rose Garden that day. (Judge Barrett, who recovered from the virus this summer, graduated from the law school and became a professor there.) Bill Stepien, Trump’s campaign manager, also tested positive. Three White House reporters have also reported testing positive this past week.

 

After Britain’s leader, Boris Johnson, had a life-or-death fight with Covid earlier this year, he came out of the hospital a bit more inclined to take scientific advice and more ready to put restrictive measures in place than he had been at the start of the pandemic. He was still torn, though, between his medical advisers and the Tories in his Cabinet, who were deeply opposed to another lockdown because they feared it could shatter the economy.

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins reported that Trump was “spooked” and “alarmed” at having the virus.

It’s impossible to know how — or even whether — this illness will change the president. But hopefully it will change his skeptical followers and make them realize that this vicious microbe really is contagious, that President Trump is not invulnerable and that therefore they are not either, that crowding together at rallies is not smart, that wearing a mask is important, and that it’s not all going to disappear like a miracle.


10/04/20 12:47 PM #8192    

 

Joseph D. McCarthy

Dear Dr. Hamilton,

As an agent for thee estate of one Charles Dickens, we ask you to immediately cease and decist with your plagarism of the title to Mr. Dicken's book "A Tale of Two Cities."  And forwith please be notified that we are sending you are bill for two cases of twinkies for your attempt to destroy the title to Mr. Dicken's classic.

Yours,

Joe

P.S.  I promise to eat only half a twinkie a month.


10/04/20 12:53 PM #8193    

 

Joseph D. McCarthy

For those interested.  Our local paper, Sunday edition, reported that the grape crop loss to vineyard owners is expected to be at least one-half of a billion dollars this year.  For you in South Carolina that is the equivalent of the years peanut crop, or $500 Million.

Better stock up on wine now.

Joe


10/04/20 01:08 PM #8194    

 

Michael McLeod

Seriously. I mean seriously if the price of wine goes up. Of all the depressing things we've contended with this year that is surely one of the most sobering -- and no that is not meant as a play on words -- one of the most sobering craptastic occurrences of an utterly craptastic year.  The two glasses of wine I share with my significant other is equivalent to the joy I get from watching the evening sky turn pink or wandering out into my back yard a few hours later to discover that one of my night blooming cereus vines has produced another outlandish and subtly fragrant bloom. It's the little things in life. Only they're not so little now that we are old enough to know better. 


10/04/20 01:11 PM #8195    

 

Mary Margaret Clark (Schultheis)

Actions do indeed speak louder than words as excerpts from Larry's link detail:

Prior to the pandemic, thanks to the Trump administration's strong economic policies, American families were benefitting from higher wages, an increasing employment-to-population ratio, and a historically low unemployment rate of 3.5 percent. In fact, in 2019, the poverty rate for the U.S. was 10.5 percent, the lowest since estimates were first released in 1959. Blacks and Hispanics, reached historic lows in their poverty rates in 2019, at 18.8 percent and 15.7 percent respectively. The U.S. median household income was $68,703 in 2019, 6.8 percent higher than in 2018, according to U.S. Census Bureau statistics released September 16, 2020. In 2019, income inequality fell for the second straight year and 4.2 million Americans were lifted out of poverty – the largest poverty reduction in American history. The COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing shutdowns launched the U.S. into a crisis, causing an extraordinary shock to the labor market, with dire projections for a full recovery as far out as 10 years. Due to these widespread shutdowns, the U.S. economy hit rock bottom in April with a historic high unemployment rate of 14.7 percent.92 The estimated cost of shutdowns is nearly $11,000 per U.S. household as of early June.

 

In August, America added nearly 1.4 million new jobs and the unemployment rate fell by 1.8 percentage points to 8.4 percent, the second largest decline on record.104 In August, Black American employment increased by 367,000, employment for Hispanic Americans increased by 1 million, and gains for women increased by 1.5 million.

 

The Trump administration provided the guidance and tools needed to help our schools safely provide the in-person instruction as advocated by the AAP and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Committee on Guidance for K-12 Education. In contrast, Democrats continue to demand burdensome nationwide lockdowns – including K-12 schools and Institutes of Higher Education (IHE) – that would not only harm the education of America’s children but also have severe long-lasting health consequences. Democrats refuse to listen to the experts and continue to politicize the nation’s children and education. President Trump followed the science and heeded the advice of the nation’s medical experts to release strong guidance to assist states and local school districts in how to safely bring kids back to school.155 In the U.S., children represent about 22% of the population, but only 1.7% of COVID-19 cases.

 

In May, President Trump announced the establishment of OWS to accelerate the development, production, and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics. OWS is a public-private partnership between components of HHS, DoD, and the private sector OWS aims to have 300 million doses of a safe, effective vaccine for COVID-19 by January 2021.

 


go to top 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page