David Mitchell
Wow Mike! Thank you for writing this great piece. Can't wait for the finished product.
I was just about to answer your post #7239 above with an almost exact copy of what Jim followed it with. How many times over the dinner table did I hear my dad wax on and on about this very thought. It is the notion that taking the time with the individual patient, looking them in the face, and touching them is actually a necessary part of most treatment. My dad used to use that exact phrase "laying on hands" and claimed it was "life giving".
I recall him ranting one night about a decison that had been made that day at OSU Medical School, where he served as a Department head for amost 45 years. Skipping some details - it was about a decison to accept one of the Juniors in pre-med, directly into Med School (a year early - a once common practice for a select few - not sure if they still do that?).
The board chose NOT to accept the one who was loved and respected by all for his wonderful, caring personality, becasue he only had a 3.7 grade accum (got a 'D' in his freshman German class and couple 'B's" somewhere else along the way. We knew him.) Instead they chose the guy with a 4.0 accum. who was an introverted, keep-to-himself, egghead that no one could warm up to. Dad was ready to explode when he got home for dinner.
I will never forget his quote, "This damn Medical School has gotten too damn political, and too damn expensive, and too damned important for it's own good. We're turning out technicians and not physicians! They know how to run every damn test known to man, but don't give a damn about the patient.
(and that was back in the 60's)
This brings back thoughts from "The Road Less Traveled" by Scott Peck. He made the point loud and clear that no mater how much analysis and how many tests, real healing doesn't usually occur unless and until the Doctor actually "cares" for the patient.
I remember that book in just about evey bookstore window and on every grocery store checkout back in the 70's. My Dad practically begged me to read it but I wouldn't normally follow my dad's advice if you held a gun at my head. Then, after two failed atempts (first 100 pages is pretty technical and boring), I was having lunch with Kevin Ryan and Steve Hodges - 2 seperate occasions - and they both said it was the most important book they had ever read. 'Nough said. I finished it and agree with Kevin and Steve (and Jim) whole-heartedly.
|