Michael McLeod
ok seriously. tell me if you think i am a prima donna.
I don't know if the dispatch does this, but like a lot of newspapers, the Orlando Sentinel started running bylines this way:
By Michael Mcleod and Orlando Sentinel Staff
not just putting the writers name above the story. crediting everybody else who had anything to do with it for their efforts - I guess that includes editors, the paperboy, etc.
this only happened recently. but it's retroactive. when I call up stories on line it has that entire-cast-and-crew byline approach. Back when I was writing it was just the writer's name atop the story. But now it's done that way, as I have discovered recently since my kids asked me to pull together a few stories for them that i wrote in my career at the cincinnati enquirer and then the orlando sentinel, mainly. And as I am compiling my old stories I keep seeing that gang-tackle headline over each one of them.
A part of me understands. It's a team effort. Give everybody a hand. But a part of me is pissed.
I was always grateful for the editors who checked over my copy and saved my butt from embarrassing mistakes lots of times. i respected the artistry of and camaraderie with photographers I collaborated with to illustrate stories, the folks who lay out the pages and run the press room, and yes, the paperboy/girl who gets it to your doorstep and hell yes, you, the readers.
But a part of me is miffed about adding on that "and staff" thing atop the story. For years the byline was just a byline. Like any writer i busted my ass on it and yes I liked seeing my name atop that story. It was an acknowledged of the magic that i was able to be a part of, informing and entertaining thousands of people i'd never meet. Even now i take joy in looking back and thinking what a privilege it was, like being able to quietly walk into the homes of thousands of strangers and whisper stories into their ears, entertain them, then quietly slip away.
The magic of writing to me was the intimacy. I'm telling stories to people I'll never see and doing my best to connect with them - again, that word: intimacy. with strangers. i'm there, in their heads, saying: isn't this interesting? how can i serve you? and hoping: gee, i hope they liked it. I hope they connected with it. i hope i added something to their day. maybe i made them smile. people i'll never know. maybe lots of them.
I mean, I'm retired now so it's game over. But still, it's a sting to my ego and the way i always felt about writing. Now: I am serious, if you think i'm being ....snooty? or spoiled? or egotistical? Just say so. It won't hurt my feelings, well, not too much, and in truth I am just puzzled that it means so much to me. It's partly because writing is so damn hard. Never got easy for me. I sweated for that byline, and yes, it was cool to see my name in print and know I created something that hopefully informed and entertained people I'd never see - hundreds, thousands of them, I hope. Seeing that spotlight shared takes some of the magic away of telling people I'll never see a story, a kind of invisible intimacy with nothing but words on the page and trying my best with those words to make them see what i saw, learn what i learned, evenexperienc e some of the emotions i felt, and be entertained by the (hopefully) smooth and occasionally clever and even beautiful way in which I put the words together so they could see it clearly maybe get a chuckle or twoalong the way.
My kids have asked me to compile some of my stories for them now that I have retired so that's why this has come up as I go searching the internet to put together a collection of them. And I keep seeing that "spanky and our gang" byline. and it just bugs me. every time i see that "and staff" tacked on it feels like an insult to the magic I felt, knowing I'd entertained thousands of strangers, however briefly, over the years.
so seriously, am i being a prima donna?
|