Message Forum

Welcome to the Watterson High School Message Forum.

The message forum is an ongoing dialogue between classmates. There are no items, topics, subtopics, etc.

Forums work when people participate - so don't be bashful! Click the "Post Message" button to add your entry to the forum.


 
go to bottom 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page      

04/10/25 07:06 PM #15391    

 

Michael McLeod

thanks mm. just seeing that parking lot/school recess spot between the i.c. grade school and the church took me back.

meanwhile here's a vaguely nostalgic story I wrote a while back for the orlando sentinel about a teacher who had a classroom next to mine.

Figured you guys are an audience that would relate. the generation gap between teacher and students is apparent as you'll see and it made for a funny ending.

Rollins College is a pretty little lakeside liberal arts school  down here.

 

Ben Hudson is a newly-hired Rollins College English professor. His  class is in bad taste. Not bad taste as in socks with sandals, gardens with gnomes and prison tattoos. Bad taste as a theme in his writing classes.

It’s a strategy he has used since his days at the University of Georgia, where he taught undergraduates while earning his Ph.D.

He starts by assigning the works of notable arbiters of taste, from ’60’s counterculture firebrand Susan Sontag to Immanel Kant, an influential 18thcentury philosopher who argued that our perception of good taste is utterly illogical.

In Kant’s view, when something strikes us as beautiful — a person, a painting, a gorgeous view — our response is purely emotional, so don’t bother arguing with us about it. De gustibus non est disputandum, said the Romans. Or, to quote the aphorism of another era which pretty much says the same thing: There’s no accounting for taste.

But Hudson is a southern-boy contrarian at heart. What he really wants his students to understand is that Kant assumed that he and his homies — namely upper-class European males — considered themselves to be the sole judges of taste, good or bad.

Yet, something that’s perceived as distasteful by the powers that be can, in fact, be a good thing — maybe even a revolutionary thing — and certainly something a good writer should investigate. So, Hudson asks students to write about something they dislike — a fad, a movie, a singer.

For inspiration, he has them read essays that celebrate outliers. One example is a rave review of a kitschy Times Square eatery called “Senor Frog” by ordinarily snooty New York Times critic Pete Wells, who applauded the eatery’s artful tackiness in decking out diners in balloon-animal head gear and offering up drinks in suggestively-shaped cups.

On the day I visited Hudson’s classroom, at the end of an Olin Library hallway decorated with posters offering chipper grammatical warnings (“How to Use a Semicolon: The Most Feared Punctuation on Earth!”), he was discussing one of the patron saints of bad taste: John Waters, the puckish filmmaker with a pencil-thin moustache who made underground movies celebrating bizarre behavior and outlandish characters in the early ’70s.

Hudson had assigned his students to watch a somewhat tamer film Waters made later in his career: the 1988 version of Hairspray, starring Ricki Lake, Sonny Bono and Divine.

The story, set in Baltimore in 1962 against the backdrop of the civil rights movement, revolves around a televised dance competition and the backlash it generates against two teenaged contestants. One is overweight, and the other is black, as are the musicians playing the songs to which all the kids — regardless of skin tone — want to dance.

It’s easy enough for anybody who came up in the ’60s to relate to the attitudes evidenced in Hairspray. But in a classroom filled with 19-year-olds who hadn’t yet been born when the movie was released — and for whom the ’60s is ancient history — Hudson’s leading questions engendered long silences and puzzled faces.

So, he provided historical perspective via a black-and-white YouTube video from 1958. A familiar figure — well, familiar to me, anyway — appeared on the screen, his eyes wild, his hair in a towering Pomade pompadour. He stood at a piano, pounding a hotwire beat into its keys and howling:

LUCILLLLEEEE! Please come back where you belong!

I been good to ya baby, please don’t leave me alone!

The flamboyant figure was, of course, Little Richard, of whom John Lennon once said: “If you don’t like rock ’n roll, blame him.”

Lucillllleeee!

I could hardly keep my feet still. After all these years, listening to music that once gave grownups headaches still felt like a guilty pleasure. Surely the classroom door was about to swing open and we were all going to get hauled off to detention.

But then Hudson switched to another video. Same era. Way different music. It was Lawrence Welk, a wunnerful, wunnerful big-band leader with a heavy German accent whose weekly television show featured such catchy songs as “The Beer-Barrel Polka.” The maestro’s music was a Saturday-night staple in my family’s living room — and every bit as exciting as its floral wallpaper.

For just a second there, during Little Richard’s romp, I had felt young again. The sensation was fleeting, thanks to one of Hudson’s students, who squinted at Welk’s image on the screen and had a flash of recognition.

“I know who that is,” she said. “My grandmother still watches him.”


04/11/25 07:48 AM #15392    

 

Michael McLeod

I apologize for being such a blabbermouth but I have a question.

Anyone else encountering memory issues?

I forget a lot.

A lot more than I used to forget.

I've actually forgotten how much I've forgotten.

I'm sure our brains get as worn down as the rest of us and I'm going to do some research and of course tell my doc about the issue but I figured this forum was a good target audience and wondered if others have suggestions/experiences along these lines.

Now, hmmm....what was it I was just talking about?

 


04/11/25 12:37 PM #15393    

 

David Mitchell

Mike,

I share your memory issue. And even more so since my accident last year. But also perhaps due to some serious sleep issues.

Anybody out there dealing with sleep apnea?  

I've been testing and fooling with masks for over 4 years and just spent my first night with the "Inspire" chip surgical implant device. Hoping it helps.

-----------

And the column about reasonable behavior in the current Oval Office hits the nail on the head. What on earth is he doing? It seems to be all about him - madness!

'nuff said.

 


04/11/25 03:24 PM #15394    

 

Mary Margaret Clark (Schultheis)

Mike....I could not read David Brooks' article as it was behind a paywall, but I did read something I will share as food for thought:

While everyone argues over tariffs and trade policy, China is quietly ramping up its war on Christianity. Starting May 1st, foreign missionaries will be banned from preaching without government approval. The Communist Party says this is about “national security.” What it’s actually about is fear—fear of people who believe in a higher authority than the state. China will only permit government-run church services, with state-approved sermons. Preach the wrong thing, and you disappear.

This is the exact opposite of what we were promised. Free trade, we were told, would liberalize China. Instead, they’ve become more aggressive—and worse, they’ve managed to export that aggression to the West. Just look at what’s happening in New South Wales, Australia. A new law makes it illegal to pray with someone if that prayer is intended to help them overcome gender-related struggles—even if they ask for the prayer.

That’s not hyperbole. The law explicitly says that “praying with or over a person with the intent to change or suppress their sexuality or gender identity” is unlawful. A parent praying with their child, a pastor counseling someone who came to them for help—both could be sent to prison. Up to five years behind bars. And the government released a video justifying this, claiming that prayer can be “deeply harmful.” This is not a dystopian novel. It’s real, and it’s happening in a country that calls itself a democracy.

Authoritarian regimes—whether in Beijing or Sydney—understand something too many in the West have forgotten: Faith is a threat to their power. Christians believe in something greater than the government, and for that, they’re being targeted. We thought we were going to change China. But what really happened is that China changed us.

 

 


04/12/25 08:50 AM #15395    

 

Michael McLeod

 sorry mm I forgot - just posting a link isn't enough to get you in to see articles - so i just downloaded it and voila, see what you think.

 

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

from ny times this week




You might have seen the various data points suggesting that Americans are losing their ability to reason.

The trend starts with the young. The percentage of fourth graders who score below basic in reading skills on the National Assessment of Educational Progress tests is the highest it has been in 20 years. The percentage of eighth graders below basic was the highest in the exam’s three-decade history. A fourth grader who is below basic cannot grasp the sequence of events in a story. An eighth grader can’t grasp the main idea of an essay or identify the different sides of a debate.

Tests by the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies tell a similar story, only for older folks. Adult numeracy and literacy skills across the globe have been declining since 2017. Tests from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development show that test scores in adult literacy have been declining over the past decade.

Andreas Schleicher, the head of education and skills at the O.E.C.D., told The Financial Times, “Thirty percent of Americans read at a level that you would expect from a 10-year-old child.” He continued, “It is actually hard to imagine — that every third person you meet on the street has difficulties reading even simple things.”

This kind of literacy is the backbone of reasoning ability, the source of the background knowledge you need to make good decisions in a complicated world. As the retired general Jim Mattis and Bing West once wrote, “If you haven’t read hundreds of books, you are functionally illiterate, and you will be incompetent, because your personal experiences alone aren’t broad enough to sustain you.”

 

Nat Malkus of the American Enterprise Institute emphasizes that among children in the fourth and eighth grades, the declines are not the same across the board. Scores for children at the top of the distribution are not falling. It’s the scores of children toward the bottom that are collapsing. The achievement gap between the top and bottom scorers is bigger in America than in any other nation with similar data.

There are some obvious contributing factors for this general decline. Covid hurt test scores. America abandoned No Child Left Behind, which put a lot of emphasis on testing and reducing the achievement gap. But these declines started earlier, around 2012, so the main cause is probably screen time. And not just any screen time. Actively initiating a search for information on the web may not weaken your reasoning skills. But passively scrolling TikTok or X weakens everything from your ability to process verbal information to your working memory to your ability to focus. You might as well take a sledgehammer to your skull.

My biggest worry is that behavioral change is leading to cultural change. As we spend time on our screens, we’re abandoning a value that used to be pretty central to our culture — the idea that you should work hard to improve your capacity for wisdom and judgment all the days of your life. That education, including lifelong out-of-school learning, is really valuable.

This value is based on the idea that life is filled with hard choices: whom to marry, whom to vote for, whether to borrow money. Your best friend comes up to you and says, “My husband has been cheating on me. Should I divorce him?” To make these calls, you have to be able to discern what is central to the situation, envision possible outcomes, understand other minds, calculate probabilities.

 

To do this, you have to train your own mind, especially by reading and writing. As Johann Hari wrote in his book “Stolen Focus,” “The world is complex and requires steady focus to be understood; it needs to be thought about and comprehended slowly.” Reading a book puts you inside another person’s mind in a way that a Facebook post just doesn’t. Writing is the discipline that teaches you to take a jumble of thoughts and cohere them into a compelling point of view.

Americans had less schooling in decades past, but out of this urge for intellectual self-improvement, they bought encyclopedias for their homes, subscribed to the Book of the Month Club and sat, with much longer attention spans, through long lectures or three-hour Lincoln-Douglas debates. Once you start using your mind, you find that learning isn’t merely calisthenics for your ability to render judgment; it’s intrinsically fun.

But today one gets the sense that a lot of people are disengaging from the whole idea of mental effort and mental training. Absenteeism rates soared during the pandemic and have remained high since. If American parents truly valued education would 26 percent of students have been chronically absent during the 2022-23 school year?

In 1984, according to the National Center for Education Statistics, 35 percent of 13-year-olds read for fun almost every day. By 2023, that number was down to 14 percent. The media is now rife with essays by college professors lamenting the decline in their students’ abilities. The Chronicle of Higher Education told the story of Anya Galli Robertson, who teaches sociology at the University of Dayton. She gives similar lectures, assigns the same books and gives the same tests that she always has. Years ago, students could handle it; now they are floundering.

Last year The Atlantic published an essay by Rose Horowitch titled “The Elite College Students Who Can’t Read Books.” One professor recalled the lively classroom discussions of books like “Crime and Punishment.” Now the students say they can’t handle that kind of reading load.

 

The philosophy professor Troy Jollimore wrote in The Walrus: “I once believed my students and I were in this together, engaged in a shared intellectual pursuit. That faith has been obliterated over the past few semesters. It’s not just the sheer volume of assignments that appear to be entirely generated by A.I. — papers that show no sign the student has listened to a lecture, done any of the assigned reading or even briefly entertained a single concept from the course.”

Older people have always complained about “kids these days,” but this time we have empirical data to show that the observations are true.

What happens when people lose the ability to reason or render good judgments? Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you Donald Trump’s tariff policy. I’ve covered a lot of policies over the decades, some of which I supported and some of which I opposed. But I have never seen a policy as stupid as this one. It is based on false assumptions. It rests on no coherent argument in its favor. It relies on no empirical evidence. It has almost no experts on its side — from left, right or center. It is jumble-headedness exemplified. Trump himself personifies stupidity’s essential feature — self-satisfaction, an inability to recognize the flaws in your thinking. And of course when the approach led to absolutely predictable mayhem, Trump, lacking any coherent plan, backtracked, flip-flopped, responding impulsively to the pressures of the moment as his team struggled to keep up.

Producing something this stupid is not the work of a day; it is the achievement of a lifetime — relying on decades of incuriosity, decades of not cracking a book, decades of being impervious to evidence.

Back in Homer’s day, people lived within an oral culture, then humans slowly developed a literate culture. Now we seem to be moving to a screen culture. Civilization was fun while it lasted.


04/12/25 01:11 PM #15396    

 

David Mitchell

 On a more positve note:

Mary Margaret's post about China and Christianity reminds me so much of my dinner conversation with Johnny Schaeufele a few nights ago. He showed me some exciting photos of his church's annual trip to Giza in Egypt. They work with a large Christian church while there and they include doctors and a pharmacy. The Muslim's show up in large numbers for the pharmacy and are treated extemely well. 

I wish Johnny would share a bit for us on the forum.

 

And in just the previous week, my church had a visitor who we help fund in Africa - Simon Guillabaud - a young British guy who just up and left his job about 20 years ago to preach the gospel in Barundi. His stories of conversion among Muslims and Witch Doctors and violence and all kinds of opposition are simply amazing!  He is candid, funny, irreverent, and brave as hell! Check him out on You Tube

 

Then just days later, one of my favourite former assistant pastors (Father Chris Royer) popped into our congregation on one of our Saturday night services. He and his wonderful Korean wife were there for a visit and he got up and spoke about his work as leader of the AFM (Anglican Foreign Missions). They go "where other missionaries don't go" - all over Africa, the Orient, and especially, the Middle East. He tells amazing stories of hundreds of secret  Christian "house churches" in Syria, Iran and Iraq.

He and his wife Grace, met while doing 13 years of missionary work in Turkey. He was once arrested by Turkish police for preaching the Gospel but the American consulate got them out on one day. They have two adorable Korean American daughters who became fabulous golfers under the  instruction of one of our other young parisioners (a local golf pro and good buddy). One girl is now a Lawyer in DC, the other went to Medical school but now works for the PGA - gotta love that - lol

They saw me in the church service and Grace was waving friuously at me in the crowd before I realized who it was. Her husband, Father Chris formed a "basketball ministiry" at our church years ago and I was one of two older guys who played for 6 years (all with younger guys) before he left for another assignment.

I realize this is boring for all of you but I never get tired of hearing some of their stories of the Gospel in "enemy territory".

It's been a pretty interesting week of testimony for me.


04/13/25 03:46 PM #15397    

 

Mary Margaret Clark (Schultheis)

Bill Maher talks about his dinner with the President: 

https://x.com/i/status/1911062372002705787


04/14/25 08:56 AM #15398    

 

John Jackson

I didn’t realize Bill Maher was so naïve – hasn’t he ever heard the old adage “Actions speak louder than words”?


04/14/25 11:32 AM #15399    

 

Mary Margaret Clark (Schultheis)

John, Maher is not naive, nor does he proclaim to have any affection for Trump....he simply relayed his 2 1/2 hour experience of being in his private company which obviously does not compute with the evil, crazed, unstable biased perception you hold of the President. 


04/14/25 12:04 PM #15400    

 

David Mitchell

I have no clue how my post on 15390 (History of Columbus) finally appeared on the page. I spent hours trying to post it and several other interesting old photos. But it would not post - some warning kept popping up.

I did not mean to erase the photo of Johnny Schauefele and I. I'll try to figure it out and post a few of the phtotographs.


04/14/25 12:29 PM #15401    

 

David Mitchell

M/M,

I cannot imagine a less credible person than Bill Maher to use in support of this current president.

A foul-mouthed annoying comedian?

Really?

(and your video is a bit before the recent "Tarriff Nightmare", which brings further discredit to Trump's lack of credibility) 

 

I'd be more apt to quote David Brooks - a well respected voice of American Conservatism.



 

 


04/14/25 01:57 PM #15402    

 

Michael McLeod

 

It looked like a crazed and unstable policy move when I read about what trump is doing with trade but I'm no expert.

Then I read up to see what the experts think. They feel pretty much the same.  I'd feel better if they didn't.

he's not just messing up the country. he's messing up the world.

 

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1911062372002705787

 

 

 

 


04/14/25 05:15 PM #15403    

 

Mary Margaret Clark (Schultheis)

Dave....say what you will about Maher....he has enjoyed a very high profile career as an American comedian (vulgar....yes), political commentator and television host of the HBO "Real Time with Bill Maher" and the earlier "Politically Incorrect" and so if I were you, I would not dismiss his credibilty so easily. I would argue that your citing David Brooks as an authentic conservative is way off the mark and as such his comments raise credibility issues of their own. Brooks may have at one time been able to identify himself as a moderate conservative, but over the years he has become anything but that. For example, his position on abortion is pro-choice, he has championed the legalization of same-sex marriage as a gain for morality. Writing in 2020, he argued that the nuclear family was a "mistake", stating that it has proven to be a "catastrophe for many and that it is time we figure out a better way to live together". He identifies with Democrats in their admiration for Obama, he gushed about Biden's candidacy and after he became President, enthusiastically commented about the wonders of his presidency. In 2007, writing about his former colleagues at National Review he stated, "I didnt' quite have their firm conviction that there is a transcendent, eternal moral order to the universe and that society should strive to be as consistent with it as possible"......with that statement he defined his worldview as the very antithesis of moral conservativism.

 


04/14/25 08:53 PM #15404    

 

John Jackson

From an article in The Atlantic Daily:

Last month, the U.S. government deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man living in Maryland with protected legal status. As The Atlantic first reported, the Trump administration acknowledged in court that Abrego Garcia’s deportation was “an administrative error”; last week the Supreme Court unanimously ordered the executive branch to “facilitate” his return to the United States.

Since then, the Justice Department has dragged its feet. It has filed required reports to a district court judge late, and has refused to say what it’s doing to bring Abrego Garcia back to the United States. But whether this was defiance or merely delay was unclear until today. In an Oval Office press conference this afternoon, the White House revealed that the answer is defiance—at least for now. Both the U.S. and El Salvador are pretending that they have no power to do anything about Abrego Garcia, a performance of smirking, depraved, and wholly unconvincing absurdity.

Forget Bill Maher, anyone out there willing to defend Trump defying a 9-0 Supreme court decision?

 


04/14/25 09:03 PM #15405    

 

John Jackson

To put events in perspective, you can never go wrong with The Borowitz Report:

Bondi Fires DOJ Employee After Finding Copy of Constitution on his Desk

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—Calling it a “serious breach of the Department of Justice’s code of conduct,” on Wednesday Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that she had terminated a career DOJ employee who was caught with a copy of the U.S. Constitution on his desk.

Bondi said that the employee, who had worked at the department for 37 years, had “raised suspicions” by using “telltale phrases like ‘due process’” in DOJ memos.

At Bondi’s direction, US marshals ransacked his office, discovered the offending document, and frog-marched him out of the building.

Bondi took the opportunity to remind all DOJ staffers that the U.S. Constitution is on the Republican Party’s banned reading list.


04/15/25 08:50 AM #15406    

Joseph Gentilini

If anyone has read about how fascism started in Germany in the 1930s and beyond, they will see many similaries with what is happening to our country today. Evil seems to be winning - our economy is in decline; violence is being encouraged; scapegoating is the order of the day; 'christian' nationalism is taking over our schools; judges are in danger; rascism is being institutionalized, etc. God help us.


04/15/25 08:55 AM #15407    

 

Michael McLeod

looks like our word for the day is "dire."


04/15/25 11:45 AM #15408    

 

Mary Margaret Clark (Schultheis)

Oh No.........the sky is falling!! 


04/15/25 12:57 PM #15409    

 

John Jackson

Call me old fashioned, but I’d say the sky is falling if a President, in obvious defiance of the Constitution, ignores a 9-0 Supreme Court ruling. 

Please MM, reassure me - help me understand why this is OK.

 


04/15/25 04:42 PM #15410    

 

Mary Margaret Clark (Schultheis)

https://x.com/ericldaugh/status/1911864478091591961?s=46&t=6ZEf-6spHk0AlDclOXEIJg


04/15/25 04:58 PM #15411    

 

David Mitchell

Isn't that the same racist hot head Steven Miller who went out of his way claiming Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was legally deported and that this talk about him being mistakenly deported was some left wing nonsense? 


04/15/25 05:44 PM #15412    

 

David Mitchell

Tired of politics and thought maybe I'd throw in a few more tidbits from my book (which may never get completely written).

I begin the book describing my childhood dreams of flying. Does anybody remember going out to old Port Columbus to greet visitors arriving on those old "tail- dragger" DC-3s with broad red stripes on the tails and the letters TWA?

 

Another major influence was my Dad's years of annual WW-2 Air Force (B-29 squadron) reunions, a four-day gathering in different cities each year, with wives and families, complete with story telling and their slide shows from India, China, Tokyo Bay, and the island of Tinian (near Guam and Saipan). I and another kid my age always sat in on those slide show/story sessions and thought they walked on water.

I had this passion since early childhood. I was at the University of Denver (to go skiing of course) and bored out of my mind, when someone asked me if I had heard about the "Student Flying Club"? You could get a "private license" for some ridiculously cheap price - like maybe $100 or so. 

I couldn't wait to call my dad and ask him if i could join the club and get my license. He said "No, not until your gades come up." I had the only argument I ever had with my Dad. I hung up the phone and told my roomate, "I'll show him." And boy did I ever.

I came up with a plan to bypass Dad's authroity entirely. I decided if I just quit going to class, they would flunk me out. Pure genious - It worked!

So from here I'll join a chapter in my book - early in what was called "U.S. Army Rotory-Wing Primary Flight School" at a place (no longer in existence) called Fort Wolters, in West Texas - just a few miles west of absolutley nowhere. (Next to the town of Mineral Wells)

 

4 - PRIMARY FLIGHT SCHOOL - Fort Wolters, Texas

 

We brand new “Green Hats” entered our new quarters on the second floor of one of the buildings. We were immediately greeted by our two “TAC Officers” (Training, Advising, and Counseling). They would be in-charge of every part of our lives outside of the flight line, or classroom training. Both were Warrant Officers and Aviators with some prior time in Vietnam.

 

I should point out that Warrant Officers are called “Mister” (not Private, Sergeant, Captain, Major, etc.) - unlike all other ranks. I always thought it sounded odd - and still do.

 

Mr. Prevost was quiet, calm and reserved. He never yelled or messed with us much, but he was sort of second in command. He hung back most of the time. Mr. Elliot, on the other hand, was in charge and was about to make our lies a living hell. That second morning he was there at five a.m. to roust us from our cots and get us out for our morning PT, and then over to the Mess Hall. And he rarely allowed us to enter the Mess Hall without (“giving him”) twenty to forty pushups. 

 

He was especially “endearing” with his inspections - a time when he and Mr. Prevost would have the entire class stand at attention out in the hallway (often in our underwear) while they searched our rooms for “violations”. Some nights these inspections came at 1:00 am and when they found something wrong, such as a thread of your “blouse” (shirt) sleeve dangling one inch loose, you were sent out into the hallway for more pushups. Or they were sometimes simply informing us of a new protocol - that our “toothbrushes will now go to the left of the toothpaste tube in your drawer - and you have 5 minutes to make the change and stand for re-inspection”. That re-inspection might last an hour or more to check each room, and they would let us all go to bed, and then show up again 3:00 a.m. to call for us to reverse that new command of just a few hours earlier. A change of protocol, followed by a reversal of that very same change of protocol – two or three nights a week. And there was a much more thorough and lengthy inspection every Saturday morning, which we all stayed up most of Friday night to prepare for.  Exhausting! 

 

Until Sundays, when we were allowed to sleep in.

                                                            

Fort Wolters had one huge helicopter airfield, on which most of the classes were based for takeoffs and landings as well as the overnight aircraft parking. That main airfield contained only the Bell TH-13s (like the ones on MASH on TV) and a similar model of Hiller helicopters. But our class was to be taught in the little TH-55 (Hughes 300), which was parked in a separate airfield across the highway from the main post. 

 

That airfield was smaller and had much less traffic, which made it a lot less hectic and a bit safer. Our class would be bussed every morning from our barracks to that separate airfield, and back again for classroom instruction on the main post every afternoon.   

 


                  A new “Green Hat” - standing by my TH-55 (Civilian Hughes 300) - March 1968                              

Note: The orange tape on my helmet spelled “stinger” - my nickname, after nearly breaking the small, curved bar, known as the stinger, protecting the tail rotor from hitting the ground - which I almost broke off while learning to hover.    Not good!

 

TBC


04/15/25 08:51 PM #15413    

 

David Mitchell

Continued;  (If you can stand a little more)

Starting that very next morning on the “hill” our class boarded a bus and headed out the main gate and down the highway to our separate airfield. As we rolled out first each morning, Russ Kelly and I would lead our class in “Roll Out the Barrel” - as loud as we could sing it, with our windows down, hoping to wake the other classes who slept later than we did.

 

We were escorted into a small classroom building and introduced to our group of about twenty or so I.P.s (Instructor Pilots). We were all in matching canvas flight suits, but the flight I.P.s all stood out with their rank markings - some Chief Warrant Officers, a few First Lieutenants bars, lots of Captain’s double bars (“railroad tracks”), a Major (bronze oak leaf), and one very young Lieutenant Colonel (silver oak leaf) - our class flight commander.

 

We were each paired, two “students” to one I.P. and seated at small tables with chairs in a sort of classroom style. Some of the instruction came in the form of writing on the blackboard at the front of the classroom - some came lecture style, given usually by the “Flight XO” – the Major. And some instruction came in the form of small groups - each I.P. with his two students at the desks. But those “skull sessions” were usually brief. We were there to go flying. Most of the longer, more detailed classroom lessons were in the latter half of the day in regular classroom buildings back on the main part of the post. The actual flight time was done with our I.P. (instructor pilot) and one of the two students at a time. After about 90 minutes or so in the air, the I.P.s would land on one of the pads near the classroom building and send that first student back inside to tell the other student to come out and have his session in the air.

 

*

My “primary” I.P. was a young boyish faced Captain from Philly with a year’s experience in Vietnam - Captain Larry Liss. He would be my I.P. throughout these first 5 months of “Primary” flight school. He was quite exacting and demanding. And at first, his stern way of instructing made me feel nervous and rather inadequate. But it was for my own good. 

 

The helicopter we trained in was different than the “Hillers” and “Bells” that the other classes flew out of the main airfield. We were going to train in the little Hughes TH-55 – a tiny aircraft - small enough to make you wonder.

 

Primary flight school was a whole new world of challenges, fears, failures, excitement, and successes. I remember after my first “demo” flight, in which Captain Liss basically just flew each of us up and around the small airfield a few times and landed. I was so excited I called my parents that night almost in tears of excitement and gratitude. I had rarely experienced such excitement! But it gets better.

 

We spent the next five months learning the basics of “rotary-wing” flight - hovering, taking off, straight and level flight, and landing. At first, I really struggled learning to hover. Everyone does – it’s a very sensitive and contrary set of controls. It was one of the most difficult things I have ever had to learn. I struggled with that for over a week - whipping Captain Liss and me in some wild gyrations. He must have had nerves of steel - and a cast iron stomach. 

 

On about my fourth or fifth day I was still bobbing and swinging back and forth so bad that Captain Liss actually kicked me out of the cockpit. That’s after I scraped the small, curved bar known as the “stinger” that protects the tail rotor from the ground. Suddenly he grabbed the controls on his side and abruptly set the ship down. He turned to me and said, “Get out”. In disbelief I said “But,,, Sir,,, what?” He reached over and grabbed my seat harness to unbuckle me himself. Then he began pushing me out of my seat and told me again to get out. I was in disbelief as I stepped down from the cockpit when he reached up and unplugged my helmet radio cord. Talk about humiliation.

 

All I could do was to start walking back toward the classroom building. We were on one of the farthest “landing pads” from the classroom building, so I would have to walk across about 200 yards of open airfield while anyone looking our way (like most of my classmates in their own cockpits) would see me. I began to cry and pulled my visor down from my helmet to cover my upper face. All I could think of was what am I going tell my parents? 

 

I had flunked out of college deliberately - for this!

 

Captain Liss followed me at a hover about 20 yards behind me as I walked across the field. After about 100 yards he suddenly flew over my head to a short distance out in front of me, spun the ship around to face me, and set it down on the ground. Then he motioned with his arm for me to come to him. 

            

I walked over to the ship and leaned up close to him. He yelled in my ear - “Get in!” I walked around the front of the cockpit and got back in on my (right) side. He hovered back to our landing pad on the outer edge of the airfield and yelled “Okay, you’ve got it. Now you are going to do this. You see that fence post? You are going to lock onto that fence post and hold us straight and still. And don’t you swing me. You will not swing me - do you hear me?” “Yes sir”. At that very moment a light bulb clicked on in my brain and I was holding it at a stable hover. A powerful sense of relief washed over me. I was actually trembling with excitement!

 

Almost forgot - TBC


04/15/25 08:59 PM #15414    

 

Michael McLeod

Dave.

Good stuff.

 

I've alway encouraged you and it's not because we're pals and it's not because I'm a nice guy and it's not because you've got stories.

Lots of guys got stories.

But you've got stories and you've got what it takes to tell them well.
 

Keep writing. Just because you want to. That's enough reason, that right there.

But I think it's more than good enough to see print.


04/15/25 09:53 PM #15415    

 

John Jackson

MM, I asked YOU to explain why Trump ignoring a 9-0 Supreme Court ruling isn't a frontal assault on the Constitution and our democracy.  If you believe so strongly, you shouldn't need to rely on a link to Stephen Miller (who, like just about everyone in Trump’s orbit, would sooner lie than tell the truth).

So surely you can tell us in your own words why we don't need to be concerned about what's happening.


go to top 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page