|
Michael McLeod
Be interesting to see a story posing the question of whether when baby boomers phase out we will leave behind a country better or worse than the one we were born into.
obviously there would be as many in one column as the other in that story.
and no I'm not writing it.
just scanning the scene.
we are clearly a more contentious country now than I can remember us ever being.
but I cherish the diversity that has grown around us since we arrived.
Jim: It's "have" not "has" in your rapidly reproducing bunny story. The first and the last "has" is ok. It's the second and third usage of "has" I'm referring to. That called for the plural, "have," and boy, are we ever talking plural both grammatically and in context.
Just a weird little grammatical situation you stumbled into. It's the kind of tricky paragraph you could use in a grammar text.
Any way, when I was young I never thought I'd love grammar. And I'm no scholar with it now. But as a writer I've come to love the logic of language. I remember our mother hammering it into us as children. It was a point of pride with her, and I love her for it still, even now more than then. I've had quite the checkered life but I'm happy I made her proud as a writer.
And finally - no I don't want to ruin a pretty morning with politics - but in light of the comment below and reading the paper today I got to a spit out my coffee moment when I read this paragraph, which Jim in particular might get a chuckle out of:
"Best of all for Republicans, a diminished Joe Biden seems determined to stay in the race, leading a dispirited and divided party that thinks of its presumptive nominee as one might think of a colonoscopy: an unpleasant reminder of age."
|