Message Forum

Welcome to the Watterson High School Message Forum.

The message forum is an ongoing dialogue between classmates. There are no items, topics, subtopics, etc.

Forums work when people participate - so don't be bashful! Click the "Post Message" button to add your entry to the forum.


 
go to bottom 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page      

10/16/20 03:02 PM #8288    

 

Michael McLeod

In spite of how this editorial begins I'm guessing, or maybe just hoping, that the way it frames the current situation - and some of the reasons for how we wound up in it - will be of interest to either side of the great divide.

 

The Trump presidency has been such a five-alarm fire that many people are understandably consumed with trying to put out the flames or simply survive it. But there will come a day, hopefully in the not too distant future, when people have the breathing room to investigate how the fire got started.

It’s tempting to heap scorn and blame on President Trump’s millions of enthusiastic supporters. Without their adoration, he wouldn’t have been able to do the damage he has done. But there are good reasons to refrain. Calling large swaths of the American electorate deplorable turns out to be an ineffective way to gain their backing.

Another reason: The mess the nation faces is bigger than Donald Trump. If he is voted out in November, the people who cast ballots for him will remain, pining for the policies he promoted. About 40 percent of American voters want tariffs and a border wallMore than half say it’s important to deport more undocumented immigrants.

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main story

Much ink has been spilled about whether Trump supporters voted for him out of economic anxiety or racial anxiety, with plenty of studies concluding the latter. But spend time at a dying factory and you might see how difficult it can be to disentangle the two.

TWITTER CHAT

Farah Stockman will discuss this editorial on Thursday, Oct. 22 at 1 p.m. Eastern on Twitter: @nytopinion.

For the past four years, I’ve followed a group of steelworkers in Indiana — men and women, Black and white — who had worked at a factory that moved to Mexico. I watched them agonize about whether to train their Mexican replacements, or stand with their union and refuse. I watched them grieve the plant like a parent. I followed them as they applied for new jobs, some of which paid half as much as they made before.

A machinist named Tim carried his steelworker union card in his wallet for years after the factory closed, just to remind himself who he was. Tim grew up in a union household. His dad had been an autoworker; his grandfather, a coal miner.

“We always voted Democrat because they looked after the little man,” Tim told me. “My father went to his grave and I can guarantee you he never voted for a Republican.”

Tim had such faith in Democrats that he didn’t worry when President Bill Clinton pushed the North American Free Trade Agreement over the finish line in 1993. Nor did he worry when Mr. Clinton normalized trade with China in 2000. But then the factory where Tim worked moved to Shanghai. And the next one moved to Mexico.

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main story

By the time I met Tim, he loathed the Clintons and the Democratic Party. Democrats had gotten in bed with the corporations, while no one was looking. Tim felt betrayed, and politically abandoned — until Mr. Trump came along.

College-educated people scoffed at Mr. Trump’s promises to bring back the factories. The factories are never coming back, they insisted. But even false hope is a form of hope, perhaps the most ubiquitous kind.

There is little doubt that Mr. Trump is president today because of blue-collar people like Tim who were once a reliable pillar of the Democratic Party. About 55 percent of voters who expected to support Mr. Trump during the 2016 primaries identified as working class, according to a 2015 study by the Public Religion Research Institute. Fewer than a third who backed other Republican candidates identified as such.

In Mahoning County, Ohio, more than a quarter of people who voted in the Republican primary were ex-Democrats, according to The Washington Post. Eighteen members of the county’s Democratic central committee crossed over to cast ballots for Mr. Trump, the county’s Democratic chairman told The Post.

Those defections stemmed in part from anger over more than five million factory jobs that went to China in the 2000s. Workers who made instrument panels for G.M. trucks in Michigan, stitched shirts in Pennsylvania and sanded wooden dressers in North Carolina saw alarming increases in child poverty, single motherhood, deaths from alcohol and drugs and reliance on public assistance.

Exposure to trade with China led to “sizable increases in the likelihood of G.O.P. victory in majority-white non-Hispanic congressional districts from 2002-2010,” said a study co-written by David Autor, an economics professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Hillary Clinton would have won Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin — and thus the presidency — in 2016 had the economic blow of imports from China been half as big, the report concluded.

It is worth noting that many of those same counties that hemorrhaged factory jobs also saw large increases in undocumented immigrants competing for the unskilled jobs that remained — cleaning hotel rooms, slaughtering chickens and mowing lawns. Their arrival fueled still more resentment of the world beyond America’s borders.

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main story

Anger about globalization is not confined to the right. It fueled the rise of Bernie Sanders, who won the endorsement of the steelworkers I followed. The same week I met Tim, I interviewed an anarchist facing criminal charges for his role in the disruption of Mr. Trump’s inauguration when windows were smashed and a limousine was set on fire. Why had he became an anarchist? NAFTA and the tyranny of global capitalism, he said.

To many, that anger can seem silly or misplaced. Free trade and globalization have undoubtedly made the country richer. But those riches have flowed disproportionately to the few with capital and education, while globalization’s downsides have piled on the shoulders of the most vulnerable Americans.

NAFTA has come to symbolize a world order crafted by elites, for elites. The deal traded away blue-collar factory jobs in exchange for white-collar opportunities to invest in Mexico’s banking and insurance sectors. Today, even its biggest supporters admit that it resulted in a net loss of American jobs.

In hindsight, it seems inevitable that globalization would cause a backlash. During the height of euphoria about free trade in the 1990s, the philosopher Richard Rorty predicted that workers “will sooner or later realize that their government is not even trying to prevent wages from sinking or to prevent jobs from being exported.” At that point, he wrote, parts of the electorate “will decide that the system has failed and start looking around for a strongman to vote for — someone willing to assure them that, once he is elected, the smug bureaucrats, tricky lawyers, overpaid bond salesmen and postmodernist professors will no longer be calling the shots.”

In countries from Britain to Brazil, voters have elected leaders who promised to reverse decades of international economic integration. Most of those populist movements are right wing. The rebellion against free trade and globalization has largely taken the left by surprise. Dani Rodrik, an economics professor at Harvard who is perhaps the country’s most prominent skeptic of unfettered globalization, lamented in an article a few months before Mr. Trump’s election that left-wing parties around the world had failed to present viable alternatives to protectionism and walls.

Since then, the landscape has changed. Joe Biden, who once whole-heartedly embraced free trade, acknowledges the harm it’s inflicted on the working class. Mr. Biden’s economic plan includes a 10 percent tax on businesses that offshore manufacturing and a 10 percent tax credit for companies that bolster job growth inside the United States. He has also put forth a plan to spend $2 trillion over four years on green energy infrastructure.

“Biden, the nominally centrist candidate, has a platform that is far more progressive than Hillary Clinton’s on economics,” Mr. Rodrik told me in an email. “But the proof of the pudding is in the eating, and we will see whether Biden will deliver real change if elected.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main story

Many Americans who longed for a strongman will vote for Mr. Trump again. They revere him for tearing up NAFTA (even if the new version looks an awful lot like the old one) and slapping tariffs on Chinese imports and Korean washing machines (even if his unpredictable trade war forced the deepest contraction in the manufacturing sector in a decade).

Yet, working-class voters who look a little deeper will notice something strange about their perceived champion: He is against unions. His first Supreme Court pick, Neil Gorsuch, helped erode the ability of unions to collect dues and fees in a landmark case. Another strange thing: The Trump administration’s interim trade deal with China focuses far more on opening up the Chinese banking and insurance sectors than on creating blue-collar jobs.

Also, Mr. Trump’s 2017 tax cut favored corporations and shareholders — including those who aren’t American citizens. Money that would have flowed into the U.S. Treasury went instead into their pockets and deep bank accounts. The companies used much of it to buy back their own stock, making their owners richer, instead of hiring and training new workers or increasing pay. The buybacks were so shameless that even Mr. Trump couldn’t defend them.

“We thought they would have known better,” he told reporters.

President Trump is the one who should have known better. He’s either incompetent or he’s a Trojan horse who used blue-collar workers to get into the White House, only to hand over the keys to the one percent. Now that the Trump administration is trying to kill the Affordable Care Act, which millions of people depend on in the middle of a pandemic, it could not be more clear whose side he is on.

Health care is one of the things that sent Shannon, a steelworker I followed in Indiana, back to the Democrats, even though most people in her family still support Mr. Trump.

“He’s bragging that he’s saving all these jobs,” she told me. “But he’s not.”

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on FacebookTwitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

 


10/16/20 04:05 PM #8289    

 

Mark Schweickart

Hey team,

I need help in remembering something. I got an email today from the Watterson Alumni Eagle Extra (or something like that) and it mentioned this was the 55th anniversary of  Watterson winning the Baseball State Championship in 1965. I am embarrassed to say that I have no recollection of this. In fact, I always felt that we (the school in general) never took baseball very seriously – certainly not way we did football and basketball. Winning the State Championship when we were Juniors, I would think would have been a huge deal for us, and I am shocked that I have no memory of this. Was baseball something we were actually that good at? Were there games that we attended as fans? Where were they played? We didn't have home games did we? I don't recall any bleachers to speak of.

Can someone fill me in on this?


10/16/20 05:08 PM #8290    

 

Michael McLeod

Mark: Being a professional journalist I made use of an investigative tool we in the trade refer to as "The Google," which took me in turn to a place we call "Wikipedia," and there after extensive research which you as a layman would not understand I found records of Watterson winning several state championship in baseball - but none in that year.

 

 


10/16/20 07:31 PM #8291    

 

John Jackson

As a former editor of the Eagle View I can't tell you how chagrined I am that Eagle View Extra is trafficking in fake news.  I worry this (dis)information is actually coming from Russian bots.


10/16/20 10:20 PM #8292    

 

Michael McLeod

I blame Trump.


10/16/20 11:34 PM #8293    

 

David Mitchell

Mark,

I always thought baseball was our premier sport (though not as popular with fans), due in part to the fact that Father Kenny Grimes was a star baseball player as a student and he was somehow involved in our coaching for a while. 

And it seemes to me that before the Covid Virus struck, Tom McKeon and Al Standish were driving to Columbus from Florida sometime this spring to be reunited with that team to receive some sort of school hall of fame award.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

- Tom?  Alan?  anybody? 

-----------------

This reminds me of the first time I ever saw Kenny Grimes. It must have been about 5th or 6th grade. We all knew we had a new assistant pastor but had yet to see him in person. It was recess and we were out on the dirt part of the playground - kind of toward the east end, farthest from High Street. (this is back before the present newer church was built)

I was hitting ground balls (could not hit fly balls that close to the old DeSantis green houses - (they already had a number of rocks and baseballs withing their glass walls - lol) to Kevin Ryan, Tom Litzinger, Joe Royce, Tommy Swain etc. This handsome large man in a long black cassock walks out from the Rectory area and over onto where we were playing. He walks up to me and asks for the bat. "Let's see how well this works", he says, as I hand him the bat. He tosses the ball up and swings. The ball went so high we almost lost sight of it. We saw it bounce out in the middle of High Street about 150 yards away (just missing a car), and then it landed on top of the Beechwold Post Office (or the Library next to it - I forget which).

We all just turned and looked at this guy - mouths open. He said something like "Yup, that one works okay".


10/17/20 12:03 AM #8294    

 

James Hamilton, M. D.

I know that several of our frequent Forum contributors discuss shows and movies that they appreciate and find interesting. That is all very informative and I enjoy their posts. I guess my tastes are a little different but I also suspect that some of our classmates, particularly those who live in certain areas, share my likes for nature and wildlife presentations.

One that I just watched (which my wife had DVRed from the Smithsonian channel) was about the various species of rattlesnakes found in the desert Southwest. It followed the rattlesnake wrangler, Jules Sylvester. It always amazes me how these guys can feel so comfortable wandering through the brush, rocks and yuccas in a pair of shorts. Bottom line is that if you understand the critters, their habitat and their camouflage you feel safe. I know that when I trek in such environments I am on high alert and constantly looking where I step.

My mother, who spent a lot of her childhood summers in Appalachian areas, had a morbid fear of snakes. To me, they were always facinating and I still look for them whenever I am out in such territory. For many years I lectured on envenomations from snakes, spiders, scorpions and venomous lizards at our hospital which seemed to be more fun than talking about the latest cholesterol drug.

So, if any of you are tired of watching Netflix or Hallmark reruns during this COVID-19 pandemic, you might want to check out those other channels that have nature shows, science topics and maybe anything else that is different - and non-political!    🐍 🦂 

Jim 

 


10/17/20 09:49 AM #8295    

Joseph Gentilini

I agree with Mike McLeod on #8312-- I blame trump!!!  I hope we get rid of this evil man.


10/17/20 12:01 PM #8296    

 

Frank Ganley

Well we are still blaming trump for all the troubles in the world. Stock market booming , jobs coming back due to the opening of the economy but whatever he does it's either too late , too much, not enough, or just dead wrong. Joe g called him evil. Somewhere under his perfectly coiffed hair is 666 only visible by left wingers !  Why has there been no discussion of last weeks shattering discovery and release of just a smattering of hunter Biden's I'll gotten gains. Tut tut tut wait with you but the Vice President did not know. Many of the emails referred to the big guy  and where is his cut etc. plugs biden had his finger in more than ladies clothing  ! Old joe and hunter rod around the world colllecting money like a bookie on Tuesday nite. Proff of his power was the removal of that prosecuted in Russia, he's either gone or the moneys gone too. His selling America's soul to China his selling Russia all that uranium , how it is just ignored by all of you on the left. With all the emails we now know the Russia Russia was all a hoax and a lie. All that he was accused of was done  ! No by trump but by the oblabla administration any word from the left


10/17/20 12:08 PM #8297    

 

Michael McLeod

Here's a fairly concise look at the, um, trumped up Hunter Biden story.

But it's from the mainstream media, Frank, so you can just dismiss it.

 

The story of Hunter Biden’s involvement with the Ukrainian gas company Burisma isn’t a scandal about his father, as the Trump campaign claims, but part of a personal tragedy for the vice president’s son, compounded by this week’s dissemination of what looks like disinformation about Joe Biden’s role.

What’s clear, beyond the false scandal-mongering, has been evident for years: Hunter Biden made a mistake getting involved with a dubious company like Burisma. But the notion that the Burisma affair undermines Joe Biden’s case to be president is, as he would say, malarkey.

The Biden campaign has been understandably reluctant to respond, for fear of giving the story legitimacy. Still, Biden has said his son made a mistake. Family friends say the vice president is reluctant to publicly criticize Hunter Biden further, but they stress that both Bidens have learned the painful lesson that a president’s children should stay away from international business. Would that the Trump family recognized that rule.

AD

To provide perspective, I talked this week with a business consultant with extensive experience in Ukraine, whom Hunter Biden contacted in early 2014 as he was considering joining the Burisma board. The consultant strongly urged against this move, but Biden, struggling with personal and financial issues, pressed ahead.

The danger that Hunter Biden’s Burisma connection might be misused was illustrated soon after. Burisma posted a photograph on its website of Devon Archer, Hunter Biden’s business partner, standing with the then-vice president before an American flag at what appeared to be the White House. Archer, with Hunter Biden, joined the Burisma board in the spring of 2014.

The consultant, who requested anonymity, said he urged Hunter Biden through a friend to have Burisma take down the photo, and it was removed from the company’s website that day. A copy couldn’t be located, but the Biden campaign doesn’t dispute that it may have been taken when Archer visited the White House in April 2014 with his son.


10/17/20 03:20 PM #8298    

 

Mary Margaret Clark (Schultheis)

In February, 2014 President Obama placed VP Joe BIden as his point man in the Ukraine.  Foreign Policy Magazine has stated that "No one in the U.S. government has wielded more influence over Ukarine that Vice-President Joe Biden". 

"A wide net of using the Biden name, using access to the White House, Hunter BIden (with friend Devon Archer) serving a pipeline to the Obama/BIden administration as a means to not only help their business clients, but to gain new ones as well. The names that come up in this network are the Chinese, the Russians, the Ukrainians, the Kazakhs.....a veritable United Nations of corruption.  What it demonstrates is that Joe Biden as VP of the United States was a center point....it was almost the planet around which these business activities moved." 

The age old tale of pay to play. Nothing new in politics, but if political corruption is ever going to be rooted out at its core, then everyone needs to be held accountable and the MSM needs to follow the money on BOTH sides and let the chips fall where they may. Investigative journalists and reporters would do us all a favor if they would just do the job they were supposedly trained to...in this case follow the money, report their findings and let the American public decide for themselves whom to believe. 

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC_Finance_Report_FINAL.pdf

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/10/how_the_mainstream_media_covered_for_joe_biden.html

https://youtu.be/nHihyFsgJGc

https://youtu.be/QJqnNlJ0aRA

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/monamholdstate-dept-feared-burisma-paid-bribe-while

 

 


10/17/20 03:38 PM #8299    

 

Mary Margaret Clark (Schultheis)

I shared this video on Facebook on this day four years ago.  Today seems to be an opportune time to share with all of you.  No matter whom you hope becomes our next President, please keep these words in your heart regardless of the outcome.heart




10/17/20 05:08 PM #8300    

 

Michael McLeod

Well, heck. One more link won't hurt.

There are false equivalencies involved here and this laid them out fairly well.

 

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/09/biden-trump-corruption/598705/


10/17/20 10:35 PM #8301    

 

John Jackson

If I may, I’d like to quote from the Atlantic article Mike references:

Both Biden and Trump pressured the Ukrainian government about corruption prosecutions, and both used the leverage of American government money to try to force action... 

The reality is that despite the facial similarities, the situations are not the same. The differences are important to understand morally, legally, and politically. There is still more to be learned about both the Biden and, crucially, the Trump cases, and new information could change the picture, but as it stands now, the essential difference is that Biden’s intervention was aimed at fighting corruption in Ukraine, while Trump’s appears to have been engaging in it…

Hunter Biden seems to have been trading on his father’s famous name to make a buck—a common but distasteful practice familiar from Billy Carter to Roger Clinton, and indeed up to the Trump children today. He’s not exempt from criticism for this behavior, but that isn’t the same as producing evidence that Joe Biden did anything untoward, something that no one has done so far. It’s still possible that more information will emerge that will implicate Biden in trying to assist his son, but Trump has already rhetorically convicted him without any such evidence.

In summary, the Burisma affair may not be the best look for troubled son Hunter and by extension his father, although I assume the senior Biden no longer controls the actions of his 50-year old son.  But if any serious misconduct happened don’t you think that Bill Barr’s ultra-politicized Justice Department and its multiple special prosecutors would have brought charges by now?

And compared to the serial and massive corruption of Trump and his kids, this kind of behavior strikes me as ... quaint?


10/18/20 11:47 AM #8302    

Timothy Lavelle

NO LOVE,

NO TACOS.

 

Big supporter.


10/18/20 11:57 AM #8303    

 

Michael McLeod

It goes without saying but I guess I will say it that the journalist quoted above is doing exactly what, yes, good journalists are supposed to do: Lay it all out there and letting the public decide. Never, in all my years in the trade, have I seen more well-researched and well-reported information become available to the public - and available at their fingertips via the marvelous interwebs. This is why I've spent so much time trying to give folks a sampler of the kind of work the dreaded and much maligned MSM is producing, though I'd rather be reminiscing about the good old days or buckeye football. Some of this excellent journalism is available behind paywalls, for about the same amount of money you once paid to have the Dispatch delivered.  That's incredibly cheap, given what's at stake - given that you may be making a judgment just based on the fact that you've seen a few things you disagree with. You may also be making a judgment based on the self-serving generalizations of a politician who thrives on insulting and belittling anyone who disagrees with him. They all do that to a certain extend but someone who wields it as his go-to tends to be covering up the fact that they don't know what the hell they are doing - either that or they know exactly what they are doing, and must demonize anyone who sees through them. It's a useful strategy. But alway a temporary one. Have I said "truth will out" lately? I don't think it hurts to say it again.

 


10/18/20 12:49 PM #8304    

 

Mary Margaret Clark (Schultheis)

Sorry Mike, I make judgements just as you do. Everyone is entitled to do their own research and arrive at conclusions. BTW, I always read the political articles you and others post. I am curious as to how you view the censorship occuring on social media where content is either being restricted, removed or demonetized.   

https://socialmediahq.com/if-social-media-companies-are-publishers-and-not-platforms-that-changes-everything/

And if Joe Biden is not complicit in his son's fraudulent dealings in Burisma and China, why the squashing of the NY Post story on all social media "platforms"?

https://www.wsj.com/articles/father-son-duo-accused-of-selling-fake-bonds-1462995193  

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/10/does_this_explain_why_facebook_suppressed_hunter_biden_revelations.html

P.S. I hope posting more than one link does not violate the Message Forum's rules. I just happened to discover an explanation for the censorship occuring on social media, so decided to add it after I first posted.  

 


10/18/20 01:31 PM #8305    

 

Michael McLeod

MM It's tricky. It's really, really tricky. And it's in flux right now and will be for quite some time. 

I haven't sorted through my own perceptions about it enough to give you an opinion.

Catholic trivia: who remembers the Legion of Decency and can tell me without using the google what its purpose was?

In the meantime I will ponder MM's question but hopefully in the meantime this will put me on her good side, at least temporarily:

I'm in the middle of writing a column that I begin with a quote from the bible.

Then God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food.”

Genesis 1:29

 

It's about a devout bbq restauranteur who is developing a non-profit, 40-acre farm/sustainable agriculture school and container farm in the middle of Orlando. Its produce will go to feed the poor and the school will educate impoverished students raised on crappy junk food about good eating habits. He quotes that passage in genesis a lot.

I'll post the column here when it runs.  

 

 


10/18/20 03:44 PM #8306    

 

Michael McLeod

This is one reason why it's an ethical issue as well as a political one when the prez gets palsy with Putin.

It's a q and a from the new yorker. Jim, I think you will find the medical aspects interesting.

Long but fascinating.

 

Alexey Navalny is the biggest thorn in Vladimir Putin’s side. A decade ago, Navalny, as a young lawyer in Moscow, started piecing together publicly available information to document corruption and abuse of power in the Russian government. At first, he used his blog to document inflated prices in government contracts, suggesting kickbacks; he moved on to documenting real-estate holdings, luxury cars, and cash reserves that government officials had registered in the names of relatives. Navalny’s one-man project grew into the Anti-Corruption Foundation, a multimedia production company with dozens of investigators whose tools have ranged from data mining to sending drones to film the estates of highly placed bureaucrats. One of Navalny’s biggest hits is a series of films about the then Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev’s sneaker-collecting habits and estate, which included three helopads, a ski slope, cascading swimming pools, a hotel-style dormitory for staff, and a little lake house for ducks, which became an Internet meme. Russian authorities have been fighting to have the films removed from YouTube, where one of them has been viewed more than thirty-six million times.

Navalny was one of the leaders of the mass protests against rigged elections that erupted in Russia in 2011 and 2012. Many of his fellow-members of the protest coördinating council are either living in exile, like the chess champion Garry Kasparov or the prisoners’-rights activist Olga Romanova, or dead, like the politician Boris Nemtsov. The Kremlin has tried to shut down Navalny and his organization through a series of court cases and arrests. But when Navalny was jailed in 2013, sentenced to five years on flagrantly trumped-up embezzlement charges, thousands of Muscovites protested and secured his release. When he was sentenced to house arrest, Navalny refused to comply, because the Russian penal code does not allow for such a punishment; after a few months, the authorities gave up, although his brother, Oleg, remained behind bars for years on spurious charges.

Navalny’s activism and reach kept expanding—he even attempted to run for President—and for a few years he seemed invincible. (In a piece for this magazine in 2016, I wrote, “The strangest thing about Alexey Navalny is that he is walking around Moscow, still.”) But, on August 20th, Navalny fell ill when returning to Moscow from the Siberian city of Tomsk. He was in a coma for twenty-six days, most of them in a hospital in Berlin. Analysis performed by multiple European labs shows that he was poisoned with a previously unknown version of Novichok, a deadly Russian-developed chemical agent. Navalny regained his ability to speak, write, and make jokes within ten days of coming out of the coma, but he has continued to experience significant physical effects owing to the poisoning. He spoke with me, over Zoom, from an apartment in Berlin, on October 8th; through the screen, it was obvious that Navalny had lost a great deal of weight, but otherwise he looked and sounded as I’d always remembered him. Our conversation has been translated from Russian and condensed.

How did you know what had happened to you?

This is the hardest part. The moment I knew that I’d been poisoned was the moment I realized my life was ending. What I was experiencing up until then was a kind of incomprehension. We can understand a heart attack or a stroke, but we cannot understand the effects of cholinesterase inhibitors—evolution does not prepare us for this. You are in this strange state of losing focus, and the strangeness keeps growing. I’ve compared it to being touched by a Dementor in a Harry Potter novel—you feel that life is leaving you. Let’s say I touch my own hand with my finger. My brain can perceive that signal and then cancel it out. But Novichok makes it not get cancelled out, so it feels like I’m touching my own hand a million times a second, and every cell in my body goes berserk, and the brain understands that this is the end.

Let’s go back a second. You have boarded a plane from Tomsk to Moscow. You’ve opened up your laptop and started watching “Rick and Morty,” as is your habit. And then—

I started losing focus. Say, right now, I see you on the screen. I understand that Kira is here in the room. [Kira Yarmysh, who is Navalny’s spokeswoman, was present during our interview; she was also seated next to him on the Tomsk-Moscow flight.] I understand this, but I cannot see it and focus on it. I have the strength to point at the screen. I see the cat who has entered the frame. But I can’t grasp the concept of “cat,” and if someone asked me to point at the cat on screen, I’d have a very hard time. On the airplane, I went to the bathroom and I realized that I would not be able to leave the bathroom on my own, and this was when I knew I’d been poisoned. It was so difficult to open the door. I could see the door, I could understand everything, and I was plenty physically strong enough—I would have been able to do pushups, if only, at that moment, I had been able to grasp the concept of pushups. I guess if I’d had sudden heart pain or abdominal pain, I would have realized even faster that I was dying, because this physical experience would have been familiar to me. But this was worse than pain.

I’m trying to understand what you are describing, using my own experience. Have you ever been sedated with opiates?

Sure, I had my appendix removed. And last month, too, I had the experience of coming out of sedation. This was nothing like it. Some people have compared it to a panic attack. But I think I understand what a panic attack feels like: a sense of growing anxiety. Anxiety is a feeling you can ultimately comprehend.

I came out of the bathroom. I could still stand upright. I saw my seat and realized I would probably never make it that far. I thought I should probably ask for help, but I also thought that, by this point, it would be useless. So I informed the flight attendant that I was about to die, right there on their plane, and I lay down.

On the floor. And then they tried to keep you awake, right?

They were saying, “Sir, stay with us, please don’t lose consciousness. . . .” But I did.

Did you have a sense of the passage of time?

I just felt indifference. It was clear that this was the end. I imagine that a person, when they are dying, thinks about important things, like, This is what I haven’t completed, or, What will happen to my children, or, What will my wife say? But I was finding it so difficult to think at all.

So those awful screams that someone recorded—

I don’t remember those. I might have been hallucinating.

And the next thing you remember was nearly a month later?

For a while, I was convinced that I was in the hospital and I’d lost my legs and was waiting for new legs to be made for me. And my wife, Yulia, and Leonid Volkov [Navalny’s closest associate in his political work] and the doctors kept telling me that I’d been in an accident and they’d make me new legs, and I shouldn’t worry. Obviously, there were no such conversations. Gradually, I started making contact with reality, in which there was Yulia and I waited for her to come every day and adjust my pillow. But I was still missing legs. And I had these awful hallucinations that really got to me, like I’m in a jail cell and the cops won’t let me sleep, and they keep asking me to recite the rules for being in jail, interspersed with lyrics by the [Russian rap group] Krovostok.

Yulia and Volkov told me that there was a prolonged period when they would sit me up, and I would just stare, and they couldn’t tell whether I recognized them. As I recall, I was having mind-blowing conversations with them in my imagination. Yulia hung up a small flip chart and marked every day I spent in the hospital with a heart in magic marker. I reacted to that flip chart and looked at it, but I don’t remember any of that. I do remember the horrible feeling when you can’t speak or write.

What do you mean?

The doctor says, “Do you understand that you are Alexey Navalny?” I do. “Do you remember your age?” I do. “Do you understand that you are currently in Berlin?” I knew this, though I wasn’t particularly interested in why I was here. “Can you say a word?” I know I have a tongue, and I have lots of words floating around in my head. But that part of the brain where a word takes shape and you pronounce it—that wasn’t processing. I couldn’t say a word. This was torture. I probably looked like the cat in that scene in “Shrek,” with intelligent eyes but speechless. I can’t say anything and I can’t even get angry, because I can’t remember how emotions work, either. But this didn’t last long—about a week. I don’t remember this, either, but Yulia and Volkov have told me that when I did start talking, I addressed everyone in English.

Then I discovered that I couldn’t write. They’d give me a piece of paper, and I realized that I couldn’t place letters in a line in the correct order. Say, “Masha.” I remember what the word looks like. I know that the first letter is “M,” followed by an “A.” I start writing—the first letter that comes out is “S.” Then I place the second letter below it—I’m writing in a column. I can see that this is totally wrong. I cross it out. I start over, and the same thing happens. This scared me, so I kept practicing, and I didn’t calm down until I was sure that I could put letters in a line and that I could write out the word I’m asked to write. I don’t remember being unable to read—they would sometimes turn on the TV to keep me entertained, and I understood the subtitles.

What was the first word you tried to write?

I wanted to ask for water, but I couldn’t come up with the word. I asked my doctor later—after all, many people have been in a coma—did they have the same experiences? He said that, first of all, my coma was unusually long. Also, it was overlaid with the poisoning by Novichok, and there is nothing to compare that to. They say the same thing about my rehabilitation: they can’t tell me anything, because, as far as we know, there are barely any known cases of people who survived Novichok. [They include the former Russian double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia, who were poisoned in England two years ago.] Plus, I was poisoned with a different kind of Novichok.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons classifies its reports, because no one wants to publish the formula. This is a thing from hell. Chemical weapons are rightly banned. Conventional weapons can be used to kill people, but also to protect them; these substances are intended solely for making people die a painful death.

How would you describe your condition now?

I’m like a little old man. I was in the I.C.U. for twenty-six days, so I figured I’d be back to normal after twenty-six more. It hasn’t been that long yet, but I notice strange things. For example, I’ve lost all flexibility. I’m like the Tin Man from “The Wizard of Oz.” I’m doing a lot of physical therapy. My first physical-therapy sessions involved two glasses of water. I had to use a tablespoon to scoop up water from one glass and pour it into the other. It was so fucking difficult. It was unbearable torment. The first time they threw a ball at me, there was no way I could have caught it. I couldn’t walk across a room. My hands were shaking. In my mind, I felt like I did before, but then I’d try to get into a car with my hands and feet shaking.

I can take long walks, up to three hours. I’m sitting as I talk to you, and it’s all right. It’s hard to concentrate for a long time, and it can get tiring to keep track of the questions and think about my answers. But that’s all right. Now, pulling a T-shirt off—that’s truly difficult. Strength is coming back faster than coördination and balance. I can now use the phone again, despite shaky hands.

By the time you came to, all the information was there, right?

The labs—one in Sweden and one in France—had already determined that it was Novichok. They’d done the testing while I was still in a coma, with Yulia’s permission. The only thing that’s happened since is the Russian authorities making crazy claims about me being a C.I.A. agent and all that.

Who was the person who gave you the information that you had been poisoned with Novichok?

Yulia. I had to be told multiple times; it took me a while to grasp. It still sounds bizarre. But the lab results—you can’t argue with those. Of course, this completely changes our understanding of how the Russian authorities work. We used to think we knew that Putin divides people up into different categories. There are the secret agents and former secret agents, and they can kill one another, poison one another, spray one another with polonium or Novichok, because they have their own rules. Then there are the politicians and other civilians. The instruments they use against politicians are arrests, fabricated criminal charges, defamation campaigns.

But to kill so blatantly, using Novichok—that sends a very strong message. A mysterious death, especially of a relatively young person, scares people. Their plan was that no medical examiner, not even the most conscientious one, would be able to find traces of Novichok. There are, maybe, only seventeen laboratories in the world that can find it. You need a super-powerful mass spectrometer. They made sure to wait forty-eight hours [before Navalny was allowed to be evacuated to Germany], and after that, they were convinced that no one would be able to find anything on me. It would have been recorded as a suspicious death. That is a stunningly effective intimidation method: “He didn’t know his place, he exposed corrupt officials, he called Putin a thief—and what do you know, he is dead at forty-four. Could be his heart gave out. Could be something else.”

You say that you thought they reserved poison for secret agents, but we know that Pyotr Verzilov, a Pussy Riot activist, was poisoned, and so was the journalist and activist Vladimir Kara-Murza, who was poisoned twice—

That’s true. It was obvious to me that they were both poisoned. They were both very healthy, and Kara-Murza, like me, turned into an old man who had to use a cane. But still—and this is the tricky thing—even though I knew both of them, and I had no doubt that they were poisoned, there is always this little voice, this bit of doubt. Like, really, did they poison them? But why didn’t they die? Maybe they really did take too much medicine? My wife went through the same thing. On the one hand, it was obvious that I’d been poisoned. On the other hand, there were all these doctors, at the hospital in Omsk, wearing their white coats, saying, “Of course, he wasn’t poisoned, of course, it’s a case of pancreatitis.” It’s hard to argue with that. They are doctors! And we are not. And Yulia and Volkov both told me that even as they were making arrangements to have me airlifted to Germany, they were thinking, What if it is pancreatitis and tomorrow he comes to in Germany, furious? When Kira was with me in the ambulance, the medics told her I had clearly O.D.’d. “Tomorrow he’ll be walking around and talking,” they said.

Novichok was apparently on something I touched. They say that if you inhale it, you die very quickly. If you ingest it with food, you are dead within an hour. If you touch it, it takes about three hours. But no one knows where it was. No one knows how this new version of Novichok acts. This scares people very effectively. You can decide not to fear being arrested or being shot. But when you are just walking around, and the next thing you know, your lifeless body is lying in the street, and a normal pathologist will never find anything?

My case is unusual because, thanks to a series of happy accidents—the pilot who decided to make an emergency landing, the ambulance staff who acted on the assumption I’d overdosed and tried to revive me, and the fact that some traces of Novichok remained even after forty-eight hours—they actually found Novichok. We got evidence. And the thing about Novichok is you can’t just go and use it. If I give you some Novichok and tell you to go kill someone with it, you are going to kill yourself and the people around you and probably not the person you are targeting. You have to be trained to use it. This definitively changes our picture of what happens inside the Kremlin, and now we have proof.

Every interviewer used to ask you, “Why haven’t you been killed yet?” So you have this understanding that you should have been killed by now, and you have people you know who nearly died from being poisoned, and yet somehow your mind tells you, This won’t happen to me, because—why?

Because you think rationally. There are a million ways to isolate someone or kill them, but this is like some trashy thriller. I find myself living inside of a James Bond movie. If you told me that they planned to kill me using Novichok and administer it in such a way that I would die on an airplane, I would say that’s a crazy plan, because there are so many ways for it to fail. It’s like if someone asked me if I believe that I’m at risk for being beheaded with a lightsabre. I’d say no, even if I saw that someone I know is missing an arm and it looks to have been lasered off.

ADVERTISEMENT

Did you have any personal safety protocols? I know that when Garry Kasparov was still living in Russia, he never drank water except from his own supply, he didn’t eat in restaurants—

VIDEO FROM THE NEW YORKER

 

Dr. Anthony Fauci on Becoming an Activist Within Government

 

I remember the first time he was in jail [sentenced to five days in 2007 for an unsanctioned protest] he didn’t eat a thing because he was afraid that they’d poison him. And we all laughed at him! We thought he was paranoid. He is the only person I know who took any security measures. But what can you do? The poison wasn’t in my food. A person can leave their apartment, open the car door, and be a goner—the door handle can serve as the contact surface. You can eat only the food you cooked yourself and drink only water you poured yourself, and still there is nothing that can keep you safe from surface contact.

Let’s summarize what preceded this poisoning, just to make sure the reader understands how you were being silenced by a thousand cuts. Give me the highlights, perhaps starting with the first case against you and ending with all your bank accounts being frozen.

Back in 2009 and 2010, my anti-corruption activities started getting people’s attention. I was filing court claims against giants like [the state-backed gas monopoly] Gazprom, and I even won a couple of times—the courts ordered them to release certain reports. In 2010, I was a World Fellow at Yale, and just when I was supposed to come back, there was a news item that I could be facing criminal charges. This was meant to keep me from coming back to Russia. I returned anyway, and they just started escalating, first by planting news stories about me, then there was the first trumped-up case against me [in 2011]. They made a mistake that I think they regret, when they let me run for mayor of Moscow. I would have won in the runoff if they hadn’t rigged the vote. So this was when they got scared enough to conjure another criminal prosecution against me, and that’s when they arrested my brother, taking him hostage.

In the last two years, the pressure has really ramped up. Our offices have been raided by law enforcement repeatedly. There have been a number of criminal prosecutions. They tried to crush our nationwide structure, which they perceive as the biggest threat to their power. We are the victims of our own success. They saw that the organization can’t be beaten down, so they decided to seek a final solution. They imagined that if they removed me from the organization, the organization would break. They were wrong.

The last two years is when you’ve promoted a strategy you call “intelligent voting.” Can you explain it?

It’s tactical voting. It’s when we convince voters to back the No. 2 candidate—we may not like him, but he has a chance to knock out the representative of the ruling party. Usually all the candidates outside of United Russia get more than fifty per cent of the vote taken together, but it’s dispersed, so United Russia always wins. We used to think we’d never convince liberal voters to back a Communist, often even a Stalinist, or vice versa—convince Communists to back a liberal candidate—but we’ve succeeded in doing that to various extents in different places. Of course, Putin and the rest of them see this as a major threat. For Putin, United Russia is a foundational political structure. Yes, he controls the courts and dominates all the other parties, but in any autocratic regime, the ruling party is the key structure. This was true in the U.S.S.R. and East Germany, and is now true in Belarus, in Russia, and in Syria. There is always a ruling political party, and its ability to reliably take elections is what gives the regime its stability.

Where has your approach worked?

In Tomsk, United Russia no longer has a majority in the city legislature, for the first time in twenty years. In Moscow, we didn’t manage to do that, but we got a bunch of very active people into the city legislature. Same in Novosibirsk.

All these years you’ve been fighting corruption. Do you think this is Putin’s most important quality—that he is corrupt?

He is obsessed with power as a way of amassing wealth. He is obsessed with money. He is personally involved in apportioning money—he decides how much he gets, how much each of his people get. Gradually, of course, power became more important. Now he is, without a doubt, the most powerful man on the planet, because nothing keeps him in check. Sure, the U.S. President leads a stronger country, but he is constrained by the courts, by Congress, by the media, by the opposing party. Putin leads a country that’s not particularly strong, but there are no constraints on him at all. He could be using this power in different ways, but to him it’s just a giant money pump. He wants more: more palaces, more money, more billions. So I have been fighting corruption, because corruption is the political foundation of this regime.

So you think that “Putin is corrupt” is a more important or precise statement than “Putin is a murderer”?

Yes. Because he murders in order to be able to perpetuate the corruption. He is different from someone like Lukashenka, for example—Lukashenka is very corrupt as well, but he doesn’t have this bottomless thirst for goatskin sofas, gold handguns, and giant palaces.

What are the palaces for? Putin can’t live in them while he is President, and he won’t be able to live with them if he ever stops being President, because if he ever loses power, he’ll end up in prison or in exile.

Why do people collect stamps or baseball cards? They die, and their descendants sell them off. Why do you accumulate as much gold as you can in a computer game? That’s how people work—they always want more. And he wants to take all the money in part so that other people don’t have it and can’t influence him.

I understand you are going back to Russia after you recover?

Of course I’m going back. If I don’t, that will be the ideal outcome for them. They’d love to have me as just another political émigré.

You have given one interview so far to a Russian journalist, the very popular YouTube talk show host Yury Dud. I found it hard to watch, because he says you are wrong to think that you were poisoned and accuses you of having delusions of grandeur. And this is a journalist who supports you politically! Yet he refuses to believe that it’s all so simple, so crude, and so cruel. What was that like for you?

I don’t mind. The news sounds so crazy that it’s hard to believe. I can afford to be O.K. with it, because the facts speak for themselves. It’s not me people are arguing with but chemistry and independent labs. Anyway, my entire political life consists of having arguments with people who believe in nothing or believe in conspiracies, or who are just dumb. So having to argue my case is nothing new. I like doing it. I’m not going to be able to persuade everyone, but I will persuade some people, simply because I stand on the facts and the truth.

 

 


10/18/20 07:08 PM #8307    

 

David Mitchell

Gosh I am feeling old again. I'm so old I can remember way back when I could read most of our posts in less than a whole evening. 

Good stuff, all of you, but golly,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

 

Oh well, I guess I was the one who started the long posts.

My bad.     Mea Culpa

 

I was going to comment (again), voicing my concern about potential violence around this election - like goading a crowd on as they chant "Locke her up, Lock her up" (and calling it "just fun") - only a week after all those FBI arrests. But I guess most of my fellow Conservatives Republicans don't think there's anything sinister about that. Or telling the Proud Boys to "stand down". 

Scary! 

I guess I'll have to go over in the corner and sit with Conservative Republican Senator Ben Sasse of Nebraska. Or Conservative columnists Bill Kristol and George Will, or Republican Governor Hogan from Maryland. Or that growing list of high ranking Generals and Admirals, I think they all share my concern. 

I find myself now praying (often) an old prayer that we used to say every night at home when we said our family rosary together  - Lord, let there be peace.


10/18/20 09:44 PM #8308    

 

Michael McLeod

I know that one I just posted about the poisoning is a monster in length. But it's not like we're chopping down forests and wasting paper. People can skip over it but I thought it was horrifying/amazing/relevant and enlightening on the ways of the world at certain pretty damn scary levels.


10/18/20 10:29 PM #8309    

 

James Hamilton, M. D.

Mike McL.,

 I actually read the whole thing (couldn't stop after the mention of cholinesterase inhibitors ☺). They are a class of well known nerve agents and is why some soldiers carry atropine injectors as an antidote into battle in the case of chemical weapon attacks.

BTW, did you know that Aricept (donezapril) is a cholinesterase inhibitor? 

Jim 

 

 


10/18/20 10:49 PM #8310    

 

David Mitchell

I bet we all know something much worse than long posts on the Forum.

The money being spent on these political campaigns is obscene. It is running onto the billions.

Just imagine that same money being spent on homeless shelters, food banks, battered womens's shelters, special employment programs for disabled, unemployed single moms, veterans assistance porgrams, or any local charity.

Shame on us and all of our candidates. 

 


10/18/20 11:28 PM #8311    

 

David Mitchell

Mike,

I feel kind of stupid. I just put two and two together and realized your article on Russian disident Alexy Navalny was the same person featured on CBS 60 Minutes earlier tonight. Duh! 

Now I wished I had watched the 60 Minute episode. The guy has an amazing story.

 

(I confess, I have not read the highlighted other referenced articles embedded within your post)


10/18/20 11:57 PM #8312    

 

David Mitchell

And Mary Margaret,

You get no arguement from me about Facebook being a very left-leaning (and self serving) arbiter of it's choice of content. I think Mark Zuckerberg is about as spineless and unprincipled as they come. 


go to top 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page