Message Forum

Welcome to the Watterson High School Message Forum.

The message forum is an ongoing dialogue between classmates. There are no items, topics, subtopics, etc.

Forums work when people participate - so don't be bashful! Click the "Post Message" button to add your entry to the forum.


 
go to bottom 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page      

10/17/20 03:20 PM #8298    

 

Mary Margaret Clark (Schultheis)

In February, 2014 President Obama placed VP Joe BIden as his point man in the Ukraine.  Foreign Policy Magazine has stated that "No one in the U.S. government has wielded more influence over Ukarine that Vice-President Joe Biden". 

"A wide net of using the Biden name, using access to the White House, Hunter BIden (with friend Devon Archer) serving a pipeline to the Obama/BIden administration as a means to not only help their business clients, but to gain new ones as well. The names that come up in this network are the Chinese, the Russians, the Ukrainians, the Kazakhs.....a veritable United Nations of corruption.  What it demonstrates is that Joe Biden as VP of the United States was a center point....it was almost the planet around which these business activities moved." 

The age old tale of pay to play. Nothing new in politics, but if political corruption is ever going to be rooted out at its core, then everyone needs to be held accountable and the MSM needs to follow the money on BOTH sides and let the chips fall where they may. Investigative journalists and reporters would do us all a favor if they would just do the job they were supposedly trained to...in this case follow the money, report their findings and let the American public decide for themselves whom to believe. 

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC_Finance_Report_FINAL.pdf

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/10/how_the_mainstream_media_covered_for_joe_biden.html

https://youtu.be/nHihyFsgJGc

https://youtu.be/QJqnNlJ0aRA

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/monamholdstate-dept-feared-burisma-paid-bribe-while

 

 


10/17/20 03:38 PM #8299    

 

Mary Margaret Clark (Schultheis)

I shared this video on Facebook on this day four years ago.  Today seems to be an opportune time to share with all of you.  No matter whom you hope becomes our next President, please keep these words in your heart regardless of the outcome.heart




10/17/20 05:08 PM #8300    

 

Michael McLeod

Well, heck. One more link won't hurt.

There are false equivalencies involved here and this laid them out fairly well.

 

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/09/biden-trump-corruption/598705/


10/17/20 10:35 PM #8301    

 

John Jackson

If I may, I’d like to quote from the Atlantic article Mike references:

Both Biden and Trump pressured the Ukrainian government about corruption prosecutions, and both used the leverage of American government money to try to force action... 

The reality is that despite the facial similarities, the situations are not the same. The differences are important to understand morally, legally, and politically. There is still more to be learned about both the Biden and, crucially, the Trump cases, and new information could change the picture, but as it stands now, the essential difference is that Biden’s intervention was aimed at fighting corruption in Ukraine, while Trump’s appears to have been engaging in it…

Hunter Biden seems to have been trading on his father’s famous name to make a buck—a common but distasteful practice familiar from Billy Carter to Roger Clinton, and indeed up to the Trump children today. He’s not exempt from criticism for this behavior, but that isn’t the same as producing evidence that Joe Biden did anything untoward, something that no one has done so far. It’s still possible that more information will emerge that will implicate Biden in trying to assist his son, but Trump has already rhetorically convicted him without any such evidence.

In summary, the Burisma affair may not be the best look for troubled son Hunter and by extension his father, although I assume the senior Biden no longer controls the actions of his 50-year old son.  But if any serious misconduct happened don’t you think that Bill Barr’s ultra-politicized Justice Department and its multiple special prosecutors would have brought charges by now?

And compared to the serial and massive corruption of Trump and his kids, this kind of behavior strikes me as ... quaint?


10/18/20 11:47 AM #8302    

Timothy Lavelle

NO LOVE,

NO TACOS.

 

Big supporter.


10/18/20 11:57 AM #8303    

 

Michael McLeod

It goes without saying but I guess I will say it that the journalist quoted above is doing exactly what, yes, good journalists are supposed to do: Lay it all out there and letting the public decide. Never, in all my years in the trade, have I seen more well-researched and well-reported information become available to the public - and available at their fingertips via the marvelous interwebs. This is why I've spent so much time trying to give folks a sampler of the kind of work the dreaded and much maligned MSM is producing, though I'd rather be reminiscing about the good old days or buckeye football. Some of this excellent journalism is available behind paywalls, for about the same amount of money you once paid to have the Dispatch delivered.  That's incredibly cheap, given what's at stake - given that you may be making a judgment just based on the fact that you've seen a few things you disagree with. You may also be making a judgment based on the self-serving generalizations of a politician who thrives on insulting and belittling anyone who disagrees with him. They all do that to a certain extend but someone who wields it as his go-to tends to be covering up the fact that they don't know what the hell they are doing - either that or they know exactly what they are doing, and must demonize anyone who sees through them. It's a useful strategy. But alway a temporary one. Have I said "truth will out" lately? I don't think it hurts to say it again.

 


10/18/20 12:49 PM #8304    

 

Mary Margaret Clark (Schultheis)

Sorry Mike, I make judgements just as you do. Everyone is entitled to do their own research and arrive at conclusions. BTW, I always read the political articles you and others post. I am curious as to how you view the censorship occuring on social media where content is either being restricted, removed or demonetized.   

https://socialmediahq.com/if-social-media-companies-are-publishers-and-not-platforms-that-changes-everything/

And if Joe Biden is not complicit in his son's fraudulent dealings in Burisma and China, why the squashing of the NY Post story on all social media "platforms"?

https://www.wsj.com/articles/father-son-duo-accused-of-selling-fake-bonds-1462995193  

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/10/does_this_explain_why_facebook_suppressed_hunter_biden_revelations.html

P.S. I hope posting more than one link does not violate the Message Forum's rules. I just happened to discover an explanation for the censorship occuring on social media, so decided to add it after I first posted.  

 


10/18/20 01:31 PM #8305    

 

Michael McLeod

MM It's tricky. It's really, really tricky. And it's in flux right now and will be for quite some time. 

I haven't sorted through my own perceptions about it enough to give you an opinion.

Catholic trivia: who remembers the Legion of Decency and can tell me without using the google what its purpose was?

In the meantime I will ponder MM's question but hopefully in the meantime this will put me on her good side, at least temporarily:

I'm in the middle of writing a column that I begin with a quote from the bible.

Then God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food.”

Genesis 1:29

 

It's about a devout bbq restauranteur who is developing a non-profit, 40-acre farm/sustainable agriculture school and container farm in the middle of Orlando. Its produce will go to feed the poor and the school will educate impoverished students raised on crappy junk food about good eating habits. He quotes that passage in genesis a lot.

I'll post the column here when it runs.  

 

 


10/18/20 03:44 PM #8306    

 

Michael McLeod

This is one reason why it's an ethical issue as well as a political one when the prez gets palsy with Putin.

It's a q and a from the new yorker. Jim, I think you will find the medical aspects interesting.

Long but fascinating.

 

Alexey Navalny is the biggest thorn in Vladimir Putin’s side. A decade ago, Navalny, as a young lawyer in Moscow, started piecing together publicly available information to document corruption and abuse of power in the Russian government. At first, he used his blog to document inflated prices in government contracts, suggesting kickbacks; he moved on to documenting real-estate holdings, luxury cars, and cash reserves that government officials had registered in the names of relatives. Navalny’s one-man project grew into the Anti-Corruption Foundation, a multimedia production company with dozens of investigators whose tools have ranged from data mining to sending drones to film the estates of highly placed bureaucrats. One of Navalny’s biggest hits is a series of films about the then Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev’s sneaker-collecting habits and estate, which included three helopads, a ski slope, cascading swimming pools, a hotel-style dormitory for staff, and a little lake house for ducks, which became an Internet meme. Russian authorities have been fighting to have the films removed from YouTube, where one of them has been viewed more than thirty-six million times.

Navalny was one of the leaders of the mass protests against rigged elections that erupted in Russia in 2011 and 2012. Many of his fellow-members of the protest coördinating council are either living in exile, like the chess champion Garry Kasparov or the prisoners’-rights activist Olga Romanova, or dead, like the politician Boris Nemtsov. The Kremlin has tried to shut down Navalny and his organization through a series of court cases and arrests. But when Navalny was jailed in 2013, sentenced to five years on flagrantly trumped-up embezzlement charges, thousands of Muscovites protested and secured his release. When he was sentenced to house arrest, Navalny refused to comply, because the Russian penal code does not allow for such a punishment; after a few months, the authorities gave up, although his brother, Oleg, remained behind bars for years on spurious charges.

Navalny’s activism and reach kept expanding—he even attempted to run for President—and for a few years he seemed invincible. (In a piece for this magazine in 2016, I wrote, “The strangest thing about Alexey Navalny is that he is walking around Moscow, still.”) But, on August 20th, Navalny fell ill when returning to Moscow from the Siberian city of Tomsk. He was in a coma for twenty-six days, most of them in a hospital in Berlin. Analysis performed by multiple European labs shows that he was poisoned with a previously unknown version of Novichok, a deadly Russian-developed chemical agent. Navalny regained his ability to speak, write, and make jokes within ten days of coming out of the coma, but he has continued to experience significant physical effects owing to the poisoning. He spoke with me, over Zoom, from an apartment in Berlin, on October 8th; through the screen, it was obvious that Navalny had lost a great deal of weight, but otherwise he looked and sounded as I’d always remembered him. Our conversation has been translated from Russian and condensed.

How did you know what had happened to you?

This is the hardest part. The moment I knew that I’d been poisoned was the moment I realized my life was ending. What I was experiencing up until then was a kind of incomprehension. We can understand a heart attack or a stroke, but we cannot understand the effects of cholinesterase inhibitors—evolution does not prepare us for this. You are in this strange state of losing focus, and the strangeness keeps growing. I’ve compared it to being touched by a Dementor in a Harry Potter novel—you feel that life is leaving you. Let’s say I touch my own hand with my finger. My brain can perceive that signal and then cancel it out. But Novichok makes it not get cancelled out, so it feels like I’m touching my own hand a million times a second, and every cell in my body goes berserk, and the brain understands that this is the end.

Let’s go back a second. You have boarded a plane from Tomsk to Moscow. You’ve opened up your laptop and started watching “Rick and Morty,” as is your habit. And then—

I started losing focus. Say, right now, I see you on the screen. I understand that Kira is here in the room. [Kira Yarmysh, who is Navalny’s spokeswoman, was present during our interview; she was also seated next to him on the Tomsk-Moscow flight.] I understand this, but I cannot see it and focus on it. I have the strength to point at the screen. I see the cat who has entered the frame. But I can’t grasp the concept of “cat,” and if someone asked me to point at the cat on screen, I’d have a very hard time. On the airplane, I went to the bathroom and I realized that I would not be able to leave the bathroom on my own, and this was when I knew I’d been poisoned. It was so difficult to open the door. I could see the door, I could understand everything, and I was plenty physically strong enough—I would have been able to do pushups, if only, at that moment, I had been able to grasp the concept of pushups. I guess if I’d had sudden heart pain or abdominal pain, I would have realized even faster that I was dying, because this physical experience would have been familiar to me. But this was worse than pain.

I’m trying to understand what you are describing, using my own experience. Have you ever been sedated with opiates?

Sure, I had my appendix removed. And last month, too, I had the experience of coming out of sedation. This was nothing like it. Some people have compared it to a panic attack. But I think I understand what a panic attack feels like: a sense of growing anxiety. Anxiety is a feeling you can ultimately comprehend.

I came out of the bathroom. I could still stand upright. I saw my seat and realized I would probably never make it that far. I thought I should probably ask for help, but I also thought that, by this point, it would be useless. So I informed the flight attendant that I was about to die, right there on their plane, and I lay down.

On the floor. And then they tried to keep you awake, right?

They were saying, “Sir, stay with us, please don’t lose consciousness. . . .” But I did.

Did you have a sense of the passage of time?

I just felt indifference. It was clear that this was the end. I imagine that a person, when they are dying, thinks about important things, like, This is what I haven’t completed, or, What will happen to my children, or, What will my wife say? But I was finding it so difficult to think at all.

So those awful screams that someone recorded—

I don’t remember those. I might have been hallucinating.

And the next thing you remember was nearly a month later?

For a while, I was convinced that I was in the hospital and I’d lost my legs and was waiting for new legs to be made for me. And my wife, Yulia, and Leonid Volkov [Navalny’s closest associate in his political work] and the doctors kept telling me that I’d been in an accident and they’d make me new legs, and I shouldn’t worry. Obviously, there were no such conversations. Gradually, I started making contact with reality, in which there was Yulia and I waited for her to come every day and adjust my pillow. But I was still missing legs. And I had these awful hallucinations that really got to me, like I’m in a jail cell and the cops won’t let me sleep, and they keep asking me to recite the rules for being in jail, interspersed with lyrics by the [Russian rap group] Krovostok.

Yulia and Volkov told me that there was a prolonged period when they would sit me up, and I would just stare, and they couldn’t tell whether I recognized them. As I recall, I was having mind-blowing conversations with them in my imagination. Yulia hung up a small flip chart and marked every day I spent in the hospital with a heart in magic marker. I reacted to that flip chart and looked at it, but I don’t remember any of that. I do remember the horrible feeling when you can’t speak or write.

What do you mean?

The doctor says, “Do you understand that you are Alexey Navalny?” I do. “Do you remember your age?” I do. “Do you understand that you are currently in Berlin?” I knew this, though I wasn’t particularly interested in why I was here. “Can you say a word?” I know I have a tongue, and I have lots of words floating around in my head. But that part of the brain where a word takes shape and you pronounce it—that wasn’t processing. I couldn’t say a word. This was torture. I probably looked like the cat in that scene in “Shrek,” with intelligent eyes but speechless. I can’t say anything and I can’t even get angry, because I can’t remember how emotions work, either. But this didn’t last long—about a week. I don’t remember this, either, but Yulia and Volkov have told me that when I did start talking, I addressed everyone in English.

Then I discovered that I couldn’t write. They’d give me a piece of paper, and I realized that I couldn’t place letters in a line in the correct order. Say, “Masha.” I remember what the word looks like. I know that the first letter is “M,” followed by an “A.” I start writing—the first letter that comes out is “S.” Then I place the second letter below it—I’m writing in a column. I can see that this is totally wrong. I cross it out. I start over, and the same thing happens. This scared me, so I kept practicing, and I didn’t calm down until I was sure that I could put letters in a line and that I could write out the word I’m asked to write. I don’t remember being unable to read—they would sometimes turn on the TV to keep me entertained, and I understood the subtitles.

What was the first word you tried to write?

I wanted to ask for water, but I couldn’t come up with the word. I asked my doctor later—after all, many people have been in a coma—did they have the same experiences? He said that, first of all, my coma was unusually long. Also, it was overlaid with the poisoning by Novichok, and there is nothing to compare that to. They say the same thing about my rehabilitation: they can’t tell me anything, because, as far as we know, there are barely any known cases of people who survived Novichok. [They include the former Russian double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia, who were poisoned in England two years ago.] Plus, I was poisoned with a different kind of Novichok.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons classifies its reports, because no one wants to publish the formula. This is a thing from hell. Chemical weapons are rightly banned. Conventional weapons can be used to kill people, but also to protect them; these substances are intended solely for making people die a painful death.

How would you describe your condition now?

I’m like a little old man. I was in the I.C.U. for twenty-six days, so I figured I’d be back to normal after twenty-six more. It hasn’t been that long yet, but I notice strange things. For example, I’ve lost all flexibility. I’m like the Tin Man from “The Wizard of Oz.” I’m doing a lot of physical therapy. My first physical-therapy sessions involved two glasses of water. I had to use a tablespoon to scoop up water from one glass and pour it into the other. It was so fucking difficult. It was unbearable torment. The first time they threw a ball at me, there was no way I could have caught it. I couldn’t walk across a room. My hands were shaking. In my mind, I felt like I did before, but then I’d try to get into a car with my hands and feet shaking.

I can take long walks, up to three hours. I’m sitting as I talk to you, and it’s all right. It’s hard to concentrate for a long time, and it can get tiring to keep track of the questions and think about my answers. But that’s all right. Now, pulling a T-shirt off—that’s truly difficult. Strength is coming back faster than coördination and balance. I can now use the phone again, despite shaky hands.

By the time you came to, all the information was there, right?

The labs—one in Sweden and one in France—had already determined that it was Novichok. They’d done the testing while I was still in a coma, with Yulia’s permission. The only thing that’s happened since is the Russian authorities making crazy claims about me being a C.I.A. agent and all that.

Who was the person who gave you the information that you had been poisoned with Novichok?

Yulia. I had to be told multiple times; it took me a while to grasp. It still sounds bizarre. But the lab results—you can’t argue with those. Of course, this completely changes our understanding of how the Russian authorities work. We used to think we knew that Putin divides people up into different categories. There are the secret agents and former secret agents, and they can kill one another, poison one another, spray one another with polonium or Novichok, because they have their own rules. Then there are the politicians and other civilians. The instruments they use against politicians are arrests, fabricated criminal charges, defamation campaigns.

But to kill so blatantly, using Novichok—that sends a very strong message. A mysterious death, especially of a relatively young person, scares people. Their plan was that no medical examiner, not even the most conscientious one, would be able to find traces of Novichok. There are, maybe, only seventeen laboratories in the world that can find it. You need a super-powerful mass spectrometer. They made sure to wait forty-eight hours [before Navalny was allowed to be evacuated to Germany], and after that, they were convinced that no one would be able to find anything on me. It would have been recorded as a suspicious death. That is a stunningly effective intimidation method: “He didn’t know his place, he exposed corrupt officials, he called Putin a thief—and what do you know, he is dead at forty-four. Could be his heart gave out. Could be something else.”

You say that you thought they reserved poison for secret agents, but we know that Pyotr Verzilov, a Pussy Riot activist, was poisoned, and so was the journalist and activist Vladimir Kara-Murza, who was poisoned twice—

That’s true. It was obvious to me that they were both poisoned. They were both very healthy, and Kara-Murza, like me, turned into an old man who had to use a cane. But still—and this is the tricky thing—even though I knew both of them, and I had no doubt that they were poisoned, there is always this little voice, this bit of doubt. Like, really, did they poison them? But why didn’t they die? Maybe they really did take too much medicine? My wife went through the same thing. On the one hand, it was obvious that I’d been poisoned. On the other hand, there were all these doctors, at the hospital in Omsk, wearing their white coats, saying, “Of course, he wasn’t poisoned, of course, it’s a case of pancreatitis.” It’s hard to argue with that. They are doctors! And we are not. And Yulia and Volkov both told me that even as they were making arrangements to have me airlifted to Germany, they were thinking, What if it is pancreatitis and tomorrow he comes to in Germany, furious? When Kira was with me in the ambulance, the medics told her I had clearly O.D.’d. “Tomorrow he’ll be walking around and talking,” they said.

Novichok was apparently on something I touched. They say that if you inhale it, you die very quickly. If you ingest it with food, you are dead within an hour. If you touch it, it takes about three hours. But no one knows where it was. No one knows how this new version of Novichok acts. This scares people very effectively. You can decide not to fear being arrested or being shot. But when you are just walking around, and the next thing you know, your lifeless body is lying in the street, and a normal pathologist will never find anything?

My case is unusual because, thanks to a series of happy accidents—the pilot who decided to make an emergency landing, the ambulance staff who acted on the assumption I’d overdosed and tried to revive me, and the fact that some traces of Novichok remained even after forty-eight hours—they actually found Novichok. We got evidence. And the thing about Novichok is you can’t just go and use it. If I give you some Novichok and tell you to go kill someone with it, you are going to kill yourself and the people around you and probably not the person you are targeting. You have to be trained to use it. This definitively changes our picture of what happens inside the Kremlin, and now we have proof.

Every interviewer used to ask you, “Why haven’t you been killed yet?” So you have this understanding that you should have been killed by now, and you have people you know who nearly died from being poisoned, and yet somehow your mind tells you, This won’t happen to me, because—why?

Because you think rationally. There are a million ways to isolate someone or kill them, but this is like some trashy thriller. I find myself living inside of a James Bond movie. If you told me that they planned to kill me using Novichok and administer it in such a way that I would die on an airplane, I would say that’s a crazy plan, because there are so many ways for it to fail. It’s like if someone asked me if I believe that I’m at risk for being beheaded with a lightsabre. I’d say no, even if I saw that someone I know is missing an arm and it looks to have been lasered off.

ADVERTISEMENT

Did you have any personal safety protocols? I know that when Garry Kasparov was still living in Russia, he never drank water except from his own supply, he didn’t eat in restaurants—

VIDEO FROM THE NEW YORKER

 

Dr. Anthony Fauci on Becoming an Activist Within Government

 

I remember the first time he was in jail [sentenced to five days in 2007 for an unsanctioned protest] he didn’t eat a thing because he was afraid that they’d poison him. And we all laughed at him! We thought he was paranoid. He is the only person I know who took any security measures. But what can you do? The poison wasn’t in my food. A person can leave their apartment, open the car door, and be a goner—the door handle can serve as the contact surface. You can eat only the food you cooked yourself and drink only water you poured yourself, and still there is nothing that can keep you safe from surface contact.

Let’s summarize what preceded this poisoning, just to make sure the reader understands how you were being silenced by a thousand cuts. Give me the highlights, perhaps starting with the first case against you and ending with all your bank accounts being frozen.

Back in 2009 and 2010, my anti-corruption activities started getting people’s attention. I was filing court claims against giants like [the state-backed gas monopoly] Gazprom, and I even won a couple of times—the courts ordered them to release certain reports. In 2010, I was a World Fellow at Yale, and just when I was supposed to come back, there was a news item that I could be facing criminal charges. This was meant to keep me from coming back to Russia. I returned anyway, and they just started escalating, first by planting news stories about me, then there was the first trumped-up case against me [in 2011]. They made a mistake that I think they regret, when they let me run for mayor of Moscow. I would have won in the runoff if they hadn’t rigged the vote. So this was when they got scared enough to conjure another criminal prosecution against me, and that’s when they arrested my brother, taking him hostage.

In the last two years, the pressure has really ramped up. Our offices have been raided by law enforcement repeatedly. There have been a number of criminal prosecutions. They tried to crush our nationwide structure, which they perceive as the biggest threat to their power. We are the victims of our own success. They saw that the organization can’t be beaten down, so they decided to seek a final solution. They imagined that if they removed me from the organization, the organization would break. They were wrong.

The last two years is when you’ve promoted a strategy you call “intelligent voting.” Can you explain it?

It’s tactical voting. It’s when we convince voters to back the No. 2 candidate—we may not like him, but he has a chance to knock out the representative of the ruling party. Usually all the candidates outside of United Russia get more than fifty per cent of the vote taken together, but it’s dispersed, so United Russia always wins. We used to think we’d never convince liberal voters to back a Communist, often even a Stalinist, or vice versa—convince Communists to back a liberal candidate—but we’ve succeeded in doing that to various extents in different places. Of course, Putin and the rest of them see this as a major threat. For Putin, United Russia is a foundational political structure. Yes, he controls the courts and dominates all the other parties, but in any autocratic regime, the ruling party is the key structure. This was true in the U.S.S.R. and East Germany, and is now true in Belarus, in Russia, and in Syria. There is always a ruling political party, and its ability to reliably take elections is what gives the regime its stability.

Where has your approach worked?

In Tomsk, United Russia no longer has a majority in the city legislature, for the first time in twenty years. In Moscow, we didn’t manage to do that, but we got a bunch of very active people into the city legislature. Same in Novosibirsk.

All these years you’ve been fighting corruption. Do you think this is Putin’s most important quality—that he is corrupt?

He is obsessed with power as a way of amassing wealth. He is obsessed with money. He is personally involved in apportioning money—he decides how much he gets, how much each of his people get. Gradually, of course, power became more important. Now he is, without a doubt, the most powerful man on the planet, because nothing keeps him in check. Sure, the U.S. President leads a stronger country, but he is constrained by the courts, by Congress, by the media, by the opposing party. Putin leads a country that’s not particularly strong, but there are no constraints on him at all. He could be using this power in different ways, but to him it’s just a giant money pump. He wants more: more palaces, more money, more billions. So I have been fighting corruption, because corruption is the political foundation of this regime.

So you think that “Putin is corrupt” is a more important or precise statement than “Putin is a murderer”?

Yes. Because he murders in order to be able to perpetuate the corruption. He is different from someone like Lukashenka, for example—Lukashenka is very corrupt as well, but he doesn’t have this bottomless thirst for goatskin sofas, gold handguns, and giant palaces.

What are the palaces for? Putin can’t live in them while he is President, and he won’t be able to live with them if he ever stops being President, because if he ever loses power, he’ll end up in prison or in exile.

Why do people collect stamps or baseball cards? They die, and their descendants sell them off. Why do you accumulate as much gold as you can in a computer game? That’s how people work—they always want more. And he wants to take all the money in part so that other people don’t have it and can’t influence him.

I understand you are going back to Russia after you recover?

Of course I’m going back. If I don’t, that will be the ideal outcome for them. They’d love to have me as just another political émigré.

You have given one interview so far to a Russian journalist, the very popular YouTube talk show host Yury Dud. I found it hard to watch, because he says you are wrong to think that you were poisoned and accuses you of having delusions of grandeur. And this is a journalist who supports you politically! Yet he refuses to believe that it’s all so simple, so crude, and so cruel. What was that like for you?

I don’t mind. The news sounds so crazy that it’s hard to believe. I can afford to be O.K. with it, because the facts speak for themselves. It’s not me people are arguing with but chemistry and independent labs. Anyway, my entire political life consists of having arguments with people who believe in nothing or believe in conspiracies, or who are just dumb. So having to argue my case is nothing new. I like doing it. I’m not going to be able to persuade everyone, but I will persuade some people, simply because I stand on the facts and the truth.

 

 


10/18/20 07:08 PM #8307    

 

David Mitchell

Gosh I am feeling old again. I'm so old I can remember way back when I could read most of our posts in less than a whole evening. 

Good stuff, all of you, but golly,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

 

Oh well, I guess I was the one who started the long posts.

My bad.     Mea Culpa

 

I was going to comment (again), voicing my concern about potential violence around this election - like goading a crowd on as they chant "Locke her up, Lock her up" (and calling it "just fun") - only a week after all those FBI arrests. But I guess most of my fellow Conservatives Republicans don't think there's anything sinister about that. Or telling the Proud Boys to "stand down". 

Scary! 

I guess I'll have to go over in the corner and sit with Conservative Republican Senator Ben Sasse of Nebraska. Or Conservative columnists Bill Kristol and George Will, or Republican Governor Hogan from Maryland. Or that growing list of high ranking Generals and Admirals, I think they all share my concern. 

I find myself now praying (often) an old prayer that we used to say every night at home when we said our family rosary together  - Lord, let there be peace.


10/18/20 09:44 PM #8308    

 

Michael McLeod

I know that one I just posted about the poisoning is a monster in length. But it's not like we're chopping down forests and wasting paper. People can skip over it but I thought it was horrifying/amazing/relevant and enlightening on the ways of the world at certain pretty damn scary levels.


10/18/20 10:29 PM #8309    

 

James Hamilton, M. D.

Mike McL.,

 I actually read the whole thing (couldn't stop after the mention of cholinesterase inhibitors ☺). They are a class of well known nerve agents and is why some soldiers carry atropine injectors as an antidote into battle in the case of chemical weapon attacks.

BTW, did you know that Aricept (donezapril) is a cholinesterase inhibitor? 

Jim 

 

 


10/18/20 10:49 PM #8310    

 

David Mitchell

I bet we all know something much worse than long posts on the Forum.

The money being spent on these political campaigns is obscene. It is running onto the billions.

Just imagine that same money being spent on homeless shelters, food banks, battered womens's shelters, special employment programs for disabled, unemployed single moms, veterans assistance porgrams, or any local charity.

Shame on us and all of our candidates. 

 


10/18/20 11:28 PM #8311    

 

David Mitchell

Mike,

I feel kind of stupid. I just put two and two together and realized your article on Russian disident Alexy Navalny was the same person featured on CBS 60 Minutes earlier tonight. Duh! 

Now I wished I had watched the 60 Minute episode. The guy has an amazing story.

 

(I confess, I have not read the highlighted other referenced articles embedded within your post)


10/18/20 11:57 PM #8312    

 

David Mitchell

And Mary Margaret,

You get no arguement from me about Facebook being a very left-leaning (and self serving) arbiter of it's choice of content. I think Mark Zuckerberg is about as spineless and unprincipled as they come. 


10/19/20 07:39 AM #8313    

 

David Dunn

 

 

       

Dave Mitchell:

       I saw your post last week about the maps which were available to the AAF in the CBI during WW2. Very interesting! 

        I was invited to an interesting event last week, in Urbana, OH, at the Aviation Museum there (Grimes air field). Apparently, it was the Sixth annual ceremony to honor our Air Force personnel in WW2. The museum is putting together some bombers from WW2.  I had been to the museum before to talk about/and inquire about my uncle David, who was killed at Imphal, India(AAF) in June 1944. I explained to them that my uncle had spent time on our ":family farm" which bordered the airport in Urbana years before he was drafted into WW2. (Ive wanted to see about the feasability of having a granite bench made, and put there, with his name on it) Although he wasnt inducted this year, I plan to attend this event again next October.


10/19/20 09:14 AM #8314    

 

Michael McLeod

FAKE NEWS! (I always wanted to say that, because it sounds so cool when Trump does. and her's my chance!)

 

The New York Post’s front-page article about Hunter Biden on Wednesday was written mostly by a staff reporter who refused to put his name on it, two Post employees said.

Bruce Golding, a reporter at the Rupert Murdoch-owned tabloid since 2007, did not allow his byline to be used because he had concerns over the article’s credibility, the two Post employees said, speaking on the condition of anonymity out of fear of retaliation.

Coming late in a heated presidential campaign, the article suggested that Joseph R. Biden Jr. had used his position to enrich his son Hunter when he was vice president. The Post based the story on photos and documents the paper said it had taken from the hard drive of a laptop purportedly belonging to Hunter Biden.

Many Post staff members questioned whether the paper had done enough to verify the authenticity of the hard drive’s contents, said five people with knowledge of the tabloid’s inner workings. Staff members also had concerns about the reliability of its sources and its timing, the people said.

 

The article named two sources: Stephen K. Bannon, the former adviser to President Trump now facing federal fraud charges, who was said to have made the paper aware of the hard drive last month; and Rudolph W. Giuliani, the president’s personal lawyer, who was said to have given the paper “a copy” of the hard drive on Oct. 11.

Mr. Giuliani said he chose The Post because “either nobody else would take it, or if they took it, they would spend all the time they could to try to contradict it before they put it out.”

Top editors met on Oct. 11 to discuss how to use the material provided by Mr. Giuliani. The group included the tabloid veteran Colin Allan, known as Col; Stephen Lynch, The Post’s editor in chief; and Michelle Gotthelf, the digital editor in chief, according to a person with knowledge of the meeting. Mr. Allan, who was The Post’s editor in chief from 2001 to 2016 and returned last year as an adviser, urged his colleagues to move quickly, the person said.

As deadline approached, editors pressed staff members to add their bylines to the story — and at least one aside from Mr. Golding refused, two Post journalists said. A Post spokeswoman had no comment on how the article was written or edited.

Headlined “BIDEN SECRET E-MAILS,” the article appeared Wednesday with two bylines: Emma-Jo Morris, a deputy politics editor who joined the paper after four years at the Murdoch-owned Fox News, and Gabrielle Fonrouge, a Post reporter since 2014.

Editors’ Picks

Ms. Morris did not have a bylined article in The Post before Wednesday, a search of its website showed. She arrived at the tabloid in April after working as an associate producer on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show, according to her LinkedIn profile. Her Instagram account, which was set to private on Wednesday, included photos of her posing with the former Trump administration members Mr. Bannon and Sarah Huckabee Sanders, as well as Roger J. Stone Jr., a friend and former campaign adviser to Mr. Trump. (In July, the president commuted the sentence of Mr. Stone on seven felonies.)

Ms. Fonrouge had little to do with the reporting or writing of the article, said three people with knowledge of how it was prepared. She learned that her byline was on the story only after it was published, the people said.

The article relied on documents purportedly taken from the hard drive to suggest that the elder Mr. Biden, as vice president, had directed American foreign policy in Ukraine to benefit his son, a former board member of Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy company.

The article also suggested that the elder Mr. Biden had met with a Burisma adviser, Vadym Pozharskyi. On Wednesday, a Biden campaign spokesman said that Mr. Biden’s official schedules showed no meeting between the former vice president and the adviser. Last month, two Republican-led Senate committees investigating the matter said they had found no evidence of wrongdoing by the former vice president.

“The senior editors at The Post made the decision to publish the Biden files after several days’ hard work established its merit,” Mr. Allan said in an email.

The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal have reported that they could not independently verify the data in the Post article, which included hedging language, referring at one point to an email “allegedly sent” to Hunter Biden.

“The story was vetted and The Post stands by its reporting,” a Post spokeswoman said in a statement.

Kenneth P. Vogel contributed reporting.

 


10/19/20 10:58 AM #8315    

 

Michael McLeod

"BTW, did you know that Aricept (donezapril) is a cholinesterase inhibitor?"

Sure Jim. I knew that. And now if you will excuse me I must get myself in a comfortable position so as to let these monkeys fly out of my ass.

On another front I suppose I should have guessed that MM was thinking FB is left-leaning when she asked me about online censorship. I thought she was referring to how to screen out all the crazy conspiracy stuff and hate-speak. 

In either case I do want to think about that subject but just can't dive into it at the moment.

 

 

 


10/19/20 11:33 AM #8316    

 

Frank Ganley

Censorship can only mean one thing it is not an interpretive word , there can be no discussion on it. In 1938 or so whenGermany was in a bit of a flux and thought hey let's give socialism an idea. If we like it we'll keep it , if we don't we'll just get rid of it. The nazi party embraced so much so that they made everyone become nazis or the alternative would not work out in you favor. First came the guns!!! 2nd amendment out the window with the baby still in the wash tub. You did't realize till the baby was gone that he was missing. What do we mood then for anyway. This is America 2020 times are different. Without the firepower we provide chaos would ensue worse yet is organized . First key the guns, the second key is censorship or fake news. Franklin, Adams . And Jerfferson feared most was an uninformemed or ill informed society, the  worst they said is censorship so there can be no discussion on and of the government. Fake news is everywhere, whether you  believe hunter biden  did collude with the russiands and chinese. And please joe don't insult us the " I rode on air force two all over the place but we never talk about hunters dealings with his dear old daddy. Nothing to see here. What makes you think it's it did't happen. Please dear Lord, guide us in our our of need, do not abandon us as the liberals have. No God in school, sports it's condemned but we are told to let Islam in our schools etc. abortion who cares, one million babies a year are murdered. Our daughter is praying for a baby, if you still believe in God say a prayer for jason and Nicole. America love it, don't leave it . Pray we cann become once again, one nation under God

 


10/19/20 12:41 PM #8317    

 

Michael McLeod

You can say that again, Frank.


10/19/20 02:36 PM #8318    

 

Mary Margaret Clark (Schultheis)

Apparently Adam Schiff also believes the Post story is "fake news" and has been trying to blame Russia for the new Hunter & Joe Biden revelations: 

"We know that this whole smear on Joe Biden comes from the Kremlin," Schiff said. That's been clear for well over a year now that they've been pushing this false narrative about the vice president and his son." 
However, this was cleared up by the Director of National Intelligence today:
"Unfortunately, it is Adam Schiff who said the intelligence community believes the Hunter Biden laptop and emails on it are part of a Russian disinformation campaign. Let me be clear, the intelligence community doesn’t believe that because there is no intelligence that supports and we shared no intelligence with chairman Schiff or any other member of Congress that Hunter Biden’s laptop is part of some Russian disinformation campaign. It’s simply not true.”
~John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence | 10/19/2020
Not even the Biden campaign denies that the laptop and emails belong to Hunter.  There are receipts from the laptop repair shop for Hunter dropping off the laptop.  Parties to some of those emails have verified them. Curiously (or maybe not), Biden was not asked one single question about the Post story or any of Hunter's overseas business dealings during his townhall on ABC last week. Biden refuses to answer questions about it on the campaign trail.  And curiously, Joe has called "a lid" on his campaign for 72 hours. Sure seems like he doesn't want to be confronted while he talks to his lawyers. 

10/19/20 03:53 PM #8319    

 

Michael McLeod

aaannnnddd:

Here's a headline you don't see every day:

Murderer Who Wielded Narwhal Tusk to Stop Terrorist Gets Royal Pardon

Queen Elizabeth II approved a rare form of clemency for an inmate who used a whale tusk to help end a deadly terrorist attack near London Bridge last year.

 

 

 


10/19/20 11:09 PM #8320    

 

Joseph D. McCarthy

First Dave M. I admire your choice in PBS shows.  I do prefer to watch BBC when I can.

Second, I knowI should have posted this over a week ago, but........      If memory  serves right, and it's getting more and more foggy, the Philadelphia Inquirer did a weeks in depth (more than a page pe day) about recent changes to the tax code in the 1980's.  The one that brought the biggest laugh was a small paragraph inserted in one of two thousand pages (just joking it was only 2,500 pages concerning new legislation on a variety of items.  Seem a certain Senator had a donor who owned alarge rental property in the U.S. Virgin Islands that had a tax case before the U.S. Virgin Islands tax court.  The Senator did what any self serving member of congress would do.  He had that paragraph inserted that made the income from a U.S. Virgin Island rental property which was purchased on or after a set date (let's say January 1982) and held for at least two years is exempt from owing any taxes to the U.S. Virgin Islands, and forwith could not be taxes by the U.S. Government.  Why were we laughing.  The article went on to say that as a result of that wording a woman who ALSO met that criteria, was able to obtain a refund of her U.S. Virgin Islands tax AND the U.S. Goverment taxes.

In between work on my normal corporate cases I was assigned to "Go after" a business that was the largest of it's typein the United States, and possibly oneof the largest in the world.  They did a lot of mail ordersback when that was not usual.  Anyway, my supervisor had another agent audit this business and hold the father, founder of the business, liable for all types of taxes because he had "SOLD" the busiess to his son, BUT had the audacity of still being involved with the business.  The tax code says this is a  No-No.

So I started the audit, knowing that the supervisor would be breathing down my neck to prove her point.  When I was finished withmy complete audit I asked to have a conference with the Owner (Son) and the head of their accounting firm to discuss my findings.  Most little items they were well aware of and had already agreed to change the way theyreported those items.  I then started talking about how the code did not look favorably on the father being involved.  The Accountant was the first to jump up and say that this was harrassmet, followed by the Owner who said they would contact their congressman AND the head of the I.R.S.  After they settled down I started asking questions, just like a good lawyer who already kknew the answers.  "When did the sale of the business take place?"  Ten years ago.  "When was it finalized?" about the same time.  "What were the Retained Earnings at the time the sale was completed?"  $xxxxxxxxxx.  "How much was the total sales price"  $xxxxxxxxxxx.  "How much was paid each year on the note buying the business?"  One -tenth.  "How was the sale reported by you (Father)?"  Capital Gains of course.  The accountant began to get a quizical look on his face. So I finalized, "father you should not have aided the business after you sold it,  You reported it at a tax rate of 3x.  Under the tax code you were still the owner and did not have a sale because you remained in the business so you in fact should have reported taxes of just 2x as DIVIDENDS, up till the time you received the amount of the retained earnings.  Then you would have paid NOTHING on the proceeds up to the amount of your basis in the business.  And afterword an money received would be capital gains.  Unfortunately the statute of limitations on all but capital gains has expired.  Now anything remaining will be taxed as Capital Gains"  "Do all of you agree with me on this subject so that we can put it to bed?"  All, especially the accountant, agreed.

Afterwards I went back and turned the case in and informed my supervisor that I had gotten them to agree to the issue; however it was a moot point because, and I explained as I had earlier done with the owner, and father, and the accountant.

Last, well I'll save that one for later.

 


10/20/20 11:12 AM #8321    

 

Michael McLeod

Joe:

Thanks.

Being an English major,  it all sounds like black magic to me. But I know a great story when I see it. 


10/20/20 04:02 PM #8322    

 

John Jackson

MM, the whole laptop brouhaha was hardly “cleared up by the Director of National Intelligence today”.  If the statement had come from any of his predecessors, it would carry some weight, but Ratcliffe is a hack who sees his top responsibility (like William Barr) to cover Trump’s a**.

Prior to being appointed to the job Ratcliffe served in the House as an (extraordinarily conservative) representative from Texas.  Trump nominated him for DNI (which is normally a non-partisan job given only to highly qualified intelligence professionals) in 2019 to replace Dan Coats, a former Republican senator from Indiana who was widely respected in the job by both parties - Trump forced Coates out because he wouldn't lie and tow the line. Trump had to withdraw Ratcliffe's nomination because of opposition from both parties based on his almost total lack of  background in intelligence or national security.  However, Trump re-nominated Ratcliffe again in early 2020 and the ever-enabling Republican Senate majority (sensing they would need a partisan hack in this important post during an election year) approved him narrowly early this year.

This is another sorry example of how once capable and effective agencies have been emasculated by the removal of knowledgeable, experienced and competent leadership and replaced by those whose top priority is to do the President’s bidding.

And as far as the laptop story itself goes, is it only my imagination or is it just a tad fishy?  The Vice President’s son drops a laptop full of emails at some random computer repair shop and then never returns to collect it?  The person who accepted the laptop is legally blind and can’t say for sure if it actually was Hunter Biden?  The involvement of Crazy Uncle Rudy Giuliani is also a nice touch.  And, oh, did you know that the New York Post is owned by that paragon of responsible journalism, tabloid king (and Fox News owner) Rupert Murdoch?


go to top 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page